Opinions? Fwd: [] List of possible approaches for Red Cross/IOC names in new gTLDS

[Alain Berranger]

Hi David, I believe you are right on your first point. This is not going
away.
I am quite sure the RC can argue a better case than the IOC...

Regards, Alain

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:27 PM, David Cake <dave at difference.com.au> wrote:

> I do not believe a resolution for Option 1 will make this issue go away.
> I would actually be interested to see Option 5 - settle once and for all
> whether there is any legal obligation, by treaty or statute, for the IOC
> and ICRC names. I believe this would eliminate the IOC claim and greatly
> diminish the IGO claim.
>
> Regards
>
> David
>
>
> On 18/07/2012, at 11:23 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From: *Brian Peck <brian.peck at icann.org>
> *Subject: **[gnso-iocrc-dt] List of possible approaches for Red Cross/IOC
> names in new gTLDS*
> *Date: *18 July 2012 11:08:58 EDT
> *To: *"gnso-iocrc-dt at icann.org" <gnso-iocrc-dt at icann.org>
>
>  In response to the request during the last RC/IOC DT call, please find
> below a list of possible approaches that have been proposed to date for
> moving forward in responding to the GAC proposal to protect the RCRC and
> IOC names at the second level in new gTLDS:
>
>
>    1. Maintain the status quo and not provide any new special protections
>    for the RCRC/IOC names (i.e., no changes to the current schedule of
>    second-level reserved names in the new gTLD Registry Agreement).
>    2. Develop recommendations to implement the GAC proposal such as
>    extending protection to all or a subset of RCRC names only, all or a subset
>    of IOC names only or, to both sets of each organization’s names.
>    3. Consider the proposal to not provide any new protections now and
>    wait to see if any additional protections may be necessary after the
>    delegation of the first round new gTLD strings and/or consider lowering
>    costs for each organization to utilize RPMs ( i.e., Thomas Rickert’s
>    proposal)
>    4. Consider possible additional protections for the RCRC/IOC as part
>    of a broader PDP on the protection of names for international organizations
>    5. Ask ICANN General Counsel’s office to conduct a legal analysis to
>    substantiate/verify whether there is clear evidence of treaty law and/or
>    statutes that would require registries and registrars to protect IOC and
>    RCRC names by law.
>
>
> Please let us know if you have any questions or need anything further at
> this time.  Thanks.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Brian
>
> Brian Peck
> Policy Director
> ICANN
>
>
>
>


-- 
Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
Member, Board of Directors, CECI,
http://www.ceci.ca<http://www.ceci.ca/en/about-ceci/team/board-of-directors/>
Executive-in-residence, Schulich School of Business, www.schulich.yorku.ca
Treasurer, Global Knowledge Partnership Foundation, www.gkpfoundation.org
NA representative, Chasquinet Foundation, www.chasquinet.org
Chair, NPOC, NCSG, ICANN, http://npoc.org/
O:+1 514 484 7824; M:+1 514 704 7824
Skype: alain.berranger
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20120724/4abd6b94/attachment-0001.html>