Alternative to SOPA - Make Piracy your Friend
Marc Perkel
marc at CHURCHOFREALITY.ORG
Sat Jan 14 15:51:29 CET 2012
WooHoo!
On 1/14/2012 6:44 AM, Mark Leiser wrote:
> Obama just released the following statement on SOPA...
>
> http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/01/14/obama-administration-responds-we-people-petitions-sopa-and-online-piracy
>
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Mark Leiser
>
> 145 Kilmarnock Road
> Suite 612
> Glasgow G41 3JA
> Tel: +44 (0)845 299-7248
> Email: markleiser at gmail.com <mailto:markleiser at gmail.com>
> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/markleiser
> <http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#%21/markleiser>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/mleiser <http://twitter.com/#%21/mleiser>
> Fax: +44 0141-404-2633
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Marc Perkel <marc at churchofreality.org
> <mailto:marc at churchofreality.org>> wrote:
>
> THE IDEA
> ========
>
> OK - here's an idea for a solution to the piracy problem that is a
> win/win solution. This eliminates the need for SOPA. It is an
> outside the box solution so think deeply. The idea is:
>
> Don't try to stop piracy. Make piracy your friend!
>
> What we not call piracy - people copying movies and songs over the
> internet - can be look at as a free advertising and distribution
> system. Allow files to be uploaded - downloaded - copied - and
> distributed. The more the better.
>
> All files will carry ID tags and public keys etc that identify the
> copyright owner, rights information, how and where to buy the
> product, web site of copyright holder and/or artist.
>
> Media players will recognize these ID tags and be able to allow
> user to immediately purchase anything with a single click that is
> tied in through paypal or google wallet or itunes and apps store
> or any number of micropayment system.
>
> Those who provide music players would have an incentive in getting
> a small piece of the transaction giving them an incentive to
> install that capability.
>
> The idea is that this is a new paradigm. Piracy becomes free
> distribution and advertizing. Kids download - they like it - they
> pass it on - they blog about it - and because it is both cheap and
> easy - they buy it. At least enough of them buy it that the RIAA
> makes a bigger profit than they are now.
>
> The model assumes that higher volume at lower costs is more
> profitable. 1 movie at $10 is the same as 10 movies at $1. The
> RIAA and MPA also eliminate their advertizing and distribution
> costs. No CDs on plastic being shipped. All money is pure profit.
>
> The paradigm shift is - yes - there will be piracy. There will be
> a LOT of people who don't pay. There will be more who don't pay
> than those who do pay. but that's OK because the real test is if
> the amount of profit in the new system is greater than that of the
> current system. I say it will be. And I have evidence to support that.
>
> Even those who don't pay benefit the copyright holders. They
> download it and play it for free. They like it and pass it on to
> 10 friends and 2 friends pay. Thus the one who didn't pay resulted
> in 2 sales. The person who didn't pay likes the music and uploads
> it to a popular blog and thousands download it resulting in
> hundreds of sales and even greater distribution.
>
> In this model all the copyright holders need to do is put it out
> there and spend the money that is automatically deposited in their
> bank account by the system.
>
> WILL IT WORK?
> =============
>
> I came up with this idea back in 2002 and presented it to EFF who
> was disinterested in solutions at the time. Since then a number of
> things have happened in the world where this model is already
> working. Several major players are already doing similar things
> and it works. This is a PDF I had made to explain it:
>
> http://www.perkel.com/piracy.pdf
>
> We are all familiar with Apple iTunes and the 99 cent songs.
> Google is now selling media through its app store. Amazon is doing
> it. Then there are the unlimited subscription models where you pay
> $8/month for all you can eat. Netflix/Pandora radio, etc. There
> are advertizing supported models like broadcast radio and TV. No
> one wants to throw me in jail for watching "Desperate Housewives"
> on my TV without paying.
>
> But - you ask - why would people pay if they don't have to?
>
> PIracy would still be illegal. But like possession of small
> amounts of marijuana in California it would be at best an
> infraction. You don't have to pay, but you are expected to. Much
> like leaving a tip at a restaurant in America. You don't have to
> tip, but people do it anyway. AND - this is important - the media
> players make it both cheap and easy to pay. It's one dollar and
> one click. It can even be less than a dollar. When I divide how
> many shows I watch on Netflix in a month into $8 it come to like
> 25 cents a movie.
>
> And .... this is also important - the music industry is your
> friend - not your enemy. The business model where the recording
> industry sues the customers for uploading a baby video with music
> to YouTube - how does that make sense. That's not marketing - that
> terrorism.
>
> Example:
>
> Proposed law fir singing a Michael Jackson and uploading it to
> YouTube - 5 years in prison.
> Killing Michael Jackson (manslaughter) - 4 years in prison
>
> MY PERSONAL EXPERIENCE
> =======================
>
> In the 1990s I owned a small software company. Had 3-5 employees
> and sold about $2 million in network control programs to companies
> like PG&E, Wells Fargo Bank, Chase Bank. I had online trial
> downloads and I exhibited at trade shows.
>
> It quickly became apparent that there ware people pirating my
> software. I tried to fight it at first but I soon realized that
> 2/3 of my business was coming from piracy. People were copying my
> programs and passing them around and they were ending up in major
> companies who were sending my large orders. And in my case these
> were not inexpensive programs. So as wierd as it seemed at the
> time - this was working. Piracy was my friend.
>
> CONCLUSION
> ============
>
> When you have a system that isn't working it's time to rethink
> everything and come up with a completely new paradigm. One thing
> that everyone agrees on is that what we have not doesn't work.
> Everyone is unhappy.
>
> The new paradigm suggested here is now proven to work. Netflix,
> Apple iTunes, Google, Amazon, Pandora, all working. Making money -
> happy customers. If you changed the distribution to include piracy
> - it would even work better.
>
> For example - now you have to download iTunes songs through iTunes
> and you're limited to that source and what they sell. But suppose
> you download a song from a web site that was just recorded
> yesterday? You play it on your iTunes player, you like it, and you
> can immediately purchase it through iTunes because the artist has
> embedded information into the song file to do that. Apple not gets
> a new sale and $$$ without even having to do anything. And the new
> purchase is automatically added to Apples inventory and is now
> searchable. The possibilities of ways to market media are endless
> once you get rid of the idea that a lot of people are going to not
> pay.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20120114/75b43780/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list