Apropos Public Comments

[Rafik Dammak]

hello,

I do agree with Avri about encouraging more individual NCSG members to send
their comments, that will give definitely more weight. I agree about
endorsing ALAC statement and coordinating with ALAC on that matter.

Best Regards,

Rafik Dammak
@rafik
"fight for the users"



2012/1/7 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>

> Hi,
>
> I think a statement that endorses the ALAC statement, which I just
> submitted to the comment area, would be a good thing.  And if there are any
> other points that people want to make that we did not cover, that would be
> good too.  There is a lot more in the program that we did not comment on
> because we wanted to hit the major points.
>
> Also any comment from individual NCSG members, especially those from
> organizations in developing economies from their perspective would be
> wonderful.  Getting a viable support program from ICANN is an uphill
> struggle, so any help from the NC world would be helpful.
>
> avri
>
>
> On 6 Jan 2012, at 11:30, William Drake wrote:
>
> > Hi Avri
> >
> > On Jan 6, 2012, at 9:48 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
> >
> >> Is there any intent amongst NCSG, NCUC or NPOC to comment on New gTLD
> Applicant Support Program: Financial Assistance <
> http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/new-gtld-applicant-support-handbook-20dec11-en.htm>
> which ends on 10 January 2012.
> >
> > Would be a good thing to do, since NC members spent a lot of juice
> supporting this effort in Council, JAS, etc.  At the same time, your ALAC
> group statement seems to cover the main points pretty well, so it's not
> clear we need a crash push to restate them differently.  Perhaps a one para
> reiteration of the highlights would suffice to add a little extra wind in
> the sails?
> >
> > BD
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20120109/677d8b8c/attachment-0001.html>