Fwd: Draft reply from GNSO to Fadi

[Alain Berranger]

There was no time to take this to NPOC-Voice... Personnally, I support this
letter.

Alain

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:26 PM, joy <joy at apc.org> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all - apologies for the lateness in sending this through to this
> list, but attached is an outreach from Mason Cole in drafting a GNSO
> Council letter to ICANN CEO.
> A number of NCSG GNSO Councillors have supported Mason to take this
> letter forward and it is on the council meeting agenda for this week.
> It is of course still open for edits and suggestions and, if you have
> any, please do feel free to share them and we can discuss these at (or
> before) the meeting
> Cheers
> Joy Liddicoat
>
>
> - -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Draft reply from GNSO to Fadi
> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:07:24 -0800
> From: Mason Cole <mcole at 5x5com.com>
> To: Maria Farrell <maria.farrell at gmail.com>, "David Cake
> (dave at difference.com.au) (dave at difference.com.au)"
> <dave at difference.com.au>, Wendy Seltzer <wendy at seltzer.com>, Wolfgang
> Kleinwächter <wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de>, "Joy
> Liddicoat (joy at apc.org)" <joy at apc.org>
>
> Maria, David, Wendy, Wolfgang and Joy --
>
> I took the liberty of drafting a council response to Fadi's request
> for the council's input on the BC/IPC proposals:
> http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg13964.html
>
> It's attached here.  The thesis is that the RPMs requested by the BC
> and IPC are in fact changes to established policy and not matters of
> implementation, and, further that using such categorizations as a
> basis for changing policy circumvents the council in a way that isn't
> acceptable.  I kept the tone reasonable but I think the message comes
> across.
>
> Before I send this to the list, would you read it over an let me know
> if it's something you can support?  I hope you can and would think
> this is something that aligns with your belief in the council's
> responsibility over policy development.
>
> I'm under little impression the BC and IPC would sign on to this, so
> perhaps the best available outcome is a letter detailing majority and
> minority positions.  What I believe should be avoided is a response
> only from the SGs, as this would further portray the council as broken
> and ineffective.
>
> Thanks for your attention.  I'd like to get this to the list soon -- I
> realize we're all quite busy, but if you could provide feedback soon I
> would be appreciative.
>
> Happy holidays --
>
> Mason
>
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ0KdgAAoJEA9zUGgfM+bqqXMH/Rk7ReBKfGezS88+D5zVcp/a
> 96gchWEdB6CDliBDjsZWVKewMbweiAH8ZROmXtSicjugw2Pa/4VOEidgUZZzRy6C
> MIFMhI3Y3rt6ts37jan4JgvY+utwQUaz5hv3owLs8CPINTJH85ZlGGR0tGk7nhNe
> X7Nmx4NCC42WqluPUf/GRF46pfcNsEb5JN5Ui8N1EADOdaI/lOPFPe7Km8fUv/IH
> l51ZzetjstDdaw9NqWkYqsdidLlHYSPbBKO+OOwL+/OI66aa5GIkKbp0E5sngWX1
> ewQDFN0c9ZSQioC6tdbdNbmZsE8AC5wdqgERAm/P5MVplJicbEEsTCoNBPnQGQA=
> =ENso
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>



-- 
Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
Member, Board of Directors, CECI,
http://www.ceci.ca<http://www.ceci.ca/en/about-ceci/team/board-of-directors/>
Executive-in-residence, Schulich School of Business, www.schulich.yorku.ca
Treasurer, Global Knowledge Partnership Foundation, www.gkpfoundation.org
NA representative, Chasquinet Foundation, www.chasquinet.org
Chair, NPOC, NCSG, ICANN, http://npoc.org/
O:+1 514 484 7824; M:+1 514 704 7824
Skype: alain.berranger


AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ
Ce courriel est confidentiel et est à l’usage exclusif du destinataire
ci-dessus. Toute personne qui lit le présent message sans en être le
destinataire, ou l’employé(e) ou la personne responsable de le remettre au
destinataire, est par les présentes avisée qu’il lui est strictement
interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer, de le modifier ou de le
reproduire, en tout ou en partie . Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou
si ce document vous a été communiqué par erreur, veuillez nous en informer
sur le champ  et détruire ce courriel et toute copie de celui-ci. Merci de
votre coopération.

CONFIDENTIALITY MESSAGE
This e-mail message is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use
of the addressee. Please note that, should this message be read by anyone
other than the addressee, his or her employee or the person responsible for
forwarding it to the addressee, it is strictly prohibited to disclose,
distribute, modify or reproduce the contents of this message, in whole or
in part. If the addressee cannot be reached or if you have received this
e-mail in error, please notify us immediately and delete this e-mail and
destroy all copies. Thank you for your cooperation.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20121220/8de7b8a8/attachment-0001.html>