Fwd: IOC/RC

Alain Berranger alain.berranger at GMAIL.COM
Thu Dec 20 19:31:17 CET 2012


Dear Colleagues,

In general I find it hard to imagine that the GNSO Council should/would
vote again if the motion has been re-tabled as it was when rejected...
Perhaps better to wait for Standing Committee on GNSO Improvements
Implementation (SCI) to look at the situation?

Alain

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:33 PM, joy <joy at apc.org> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear colleagues,
> We have had this approach from a fellow GNSO Councillor.
> Please share your views to help guide us. At the NCSG meeting
> yesterday (MP3 recording circulated yesterday by Robin) we agreed to
> raise a number of procedural concerns about this re-tabled motion, to
> make the point we vigorously oppose it, but we did not agree to
> request a deferral (a course of action I would not support).
> Views?
> Joy
>
>
>
> - -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: IOC/RC
> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 10:26:31 -0800
> From: Mason Cole <mcole at 5x5com.com>
> To: David Cake <dave at difference.com.au>, Maria Farrell
> <maria.farrell at gmail.com>, "Joy Liddicoat (joy at apc.org)"
> <joy at apc.org>, Magaly <mpazello at e-fem.net>, Wendy Seltzer
> <wendy at seltzer.com>, Wolfgang Kleinwächter
> <wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de>
>
> Greetings NCSG colleagues --
>
> I'm writing about tomorrow's scheduled IOC/RC vote.  I wanted to get
> your temperature on this as I've been thinking about it for some time now.
>
> I agree with you that the position we find ourselves in now was
> arrived at through a bad process.  I'm not in favor of reconsidering
> motions in general, and I hope the council is better educated on
> procedure (I know I'm trying myself).  I'm concerned about the
> council's image regarding efficiency and that certainly didn't help.
> I'm hoping we can get this voted on tomorrow and get it behind us,
> whether the result is yea or nay.  I'm concerned if someone tries to
> defer, it will merely delay -- we've debated the issue pretty
> thoroughly and I doubt any votes will change.
>
> Any thoughts on this?
>
> Mason
>
>
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ0haeAAoJEA9zUGgfM+bqZBoH/0gjbkRPleW5Vf303V3PzZAb
> I8bnmbFbF27qAOS2eGhPVsmOnrBZaEGAihmPDEJFJKua0xsl+5N1zVLRgjceITPA
> WzU1DnhABHQr02PejjDjcJyqYfzc5S85p4pJp0y+CNTNsG9DxHpqnmL5j5kLQ/Or
> ls53tlYACaYnv6D7tWpzOpkzwUs77llcKf1lws3KK2juiwBhezqGUNt2f92bx836
> PrMZza4GuoWGvHwytVA6JKCyygp4ogiuFblFzfMBsCZE3mc3ct4MpHXrPHlwEPqw
> hfvH+1/D7wpDoKsDXeHVNA50la9ONY+rKczFrjzHdn/emkvo8Gs8SN4ry6OXHzc=
> =wc/9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>



-- 
Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
Member, Board of Directors, CECI,
http://www.ceci.ca<http://www.ceci.ca/en/about-ceci/team/board-of-directors/>
Executive-in-residence, Schulich School of Business, www.schulich.yorku.ca
Treasurer, Global Knowledge Partnership Foundation, www.gkpfoundation.org
NA representative, Chasquinet Foundation, www.chasquinet.org
Chair, NPOC, NCSG, ICANN, http://npoc.org/
O:+1 514 484 7824; M:+1 514 704 7824
Skype: alain.berranger


AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ
Ce courriel est confidentiel et est à l’usage exclusif du destinataire
ci-dessus. Toute personne qui lit le présent message sans en être le
destinataire, ou l’employé(e) ou la personne responsable de le remettre au
destinataire, est par les présentes avisée qu’il lui est strictement
interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer, de le modifier ou de le
reproduire, en tout ou en partie . Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou
si ce document vous a été communiqué par erreur, veuillez nous en informer
sur le champ  et détruire ce courriel et toute copie de celui-ci. Merci de
votre coopération.

CONFIDENTIALITY MESSAGE
This e-mail message is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use
of the addressee. Please note that, should this message be read by anyone
other than the addressee, his or her employee or the person responsible for
forwarding it to the addressee, it is strictly prohibited to disclose,
distribute, modify or reproduce the contents of this message, in whole or
in part. If the addressee cannot be reached or if you have received this
e-mail in error, please notify us immediately and delete this e-mail and
destroy all copies. Thank you for your cooperation.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20121220/b2f1703a/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list