The DNS problem

[Carl Smith]

Thanks Mike,

You're on the right track, But V4 and v6 are MS proprietary and the
latter is fully under MS control.  I don't have an answer which solves
the problem.

Lou

On 8/21/2012 10:46 AM, Michael Haffely wrote:
> Under IPv4 that may be true, but under IPv6 all devices may have
> unique identifiers and most of the problems of end-to-end connectivity
> and are removed.
>
> HTML5's  WEBRTC has some intriguing potential to remove the tyranny of
> a "central point of control"
>
> -Mike
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Carl Smith <lectriclou at hotmail.com
> <mailto:lectriclou at hotmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     The DNS problem and reason for confusion is due to limitations
>     imposed during the infancy of development stages of machine
>     inter-connectivity. Basically, IP is insufficient to grant each
>     machine a unique identity. The limited IP addresses are licensed
>     to master networks which in turn are sub-netted to machines which
>     only have a local identity slaved to the master.
>
>     Ultimately, we need a unique ID for each machine which is not
>     slaved or controlled by a master. In that case the machines become
>     individual entities. We need a DNS system which recognizes this
>     unique character and allows direct connection between unique entities.
>
>     This is not what commercial enterprise demands. The corporate
>     entities only have one rule: Profit. This is in direct conflict
>     with individual liberty. A system of controlled connection is the
>     preference of the profiteer. Thus we have our current Internet
>     authority.
>
>     What we as noncommercial enthusiasts desire is secure open
>     connectivity directly between unique identities which is secure
>     yet unhampered by overt regulation by commercial interest such as
>     corporations which includes government.
>
>
>     Just my thoughts,
>
>     Lou Smith
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20120822/965d71fe/attachment-0001.html>