Fwd: [council] A New Approach to Africa

[McTim]

Milton,

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

>  Well said, Alex.
>


It's NOT particularly well said actually, as the AfriNIC BoD is NOT the
policy making table, they simplly affirm that the policy making process
(PDP) was followed when they ratify a new policy.

PLUS, the AfriNIC BoD (and staff) have nothing to do with the AfrICANN
community way of working, they are chalk and cheese.  One simply provides a
server/mailing list software and bandwidth for the other.

In addition, SGs are not meant to be represented.  Is this what you want
fixed?



>  Can this be fixed?
>


Sure, bylaws can be changed.  What exactly do you want fixed?   given the
regional politics involved in forming AfriNIC in the first place, i doubt
you will get much traction on changing regional representation with
stakeholder grouping representation, but you can try.

Why you would want to escapes me, but knock yourselves out!


--
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel



> ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* NCSG-Discuss [mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] *On Behalf Of
> *Alex Gakuru
>
> Mailing lists can/are open but effective policy influence is achieved with
> representation on the policy making table. Their 6-person BOD structure
> http://www.afrinic.net/en/our-structure/bod  of Eastern Africa(1), Indian
> Ocean(1), Northern Africa(1), Western Africa(1), Central Africa(1),
> Southern Africa(1) are business, ccTLDs and government persons. It does not
> provide for civil society representatives. Or would I be missing one
> (including on the listed past) BOD members?
>
>  ****
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20120813/361c1414/attachment-0001.html>