NCUC input on new gTLDs and human rights

joy joy at APC.ORG
Mon Aug 13 03:18:01 CEST 2012


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi all - thanks so much to all those who have commented on this (about
23 people from my rough count). A final is available here which
finetunes and finalises to incorporate the comments received:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/17ijURQYy1uKh27NyDEWh_V1zhCDCIvVtdzUEJLaNmyE/edit

You can see the various comments and responses if you click on the
"comments" tab - the comments will drop down. You don't need a google
account to access and comment on this. A number of people have had
difficulty accessing the document - please let me know if you would
like me to email it to you separately.

As you may be aware, ICANN decided late Friday to extend the time
public comment for the new gTLDs. The new deadline is 26 September:
http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/announcements-and-media/announcement-10aug12-en

However, I suggest we submit the comment now, rather than wait. Doing
so would allow time for others to respond and, if necessary, for us to
further develop the work in light of other comments. It would also
allow others to state their support or endorsement.
I am happy to submit this for NCUC and will do so by the end of 13
August, subject to any last comments received today.


Thanks again

Joy

On 6/08/2012 4:11 p.m., joy wrote:
> Hi again - thanks for the on-going discussion on the google
> document. We have some areas of consensus and some of on-going
> debate, but no new issues in the last few days. On that basis I
> will prepare a more detailed draft suitable for submission and
> circulate this to the list aroudn Wednesday this week. Comments are
> due no later than Sunday 12 August. cheers
>
> Joy
>
> On 27/07/2012 1:54 a.m., Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
>> I see only one "anonymous" comment: "This is wrong, and is a
>> claim that has no basis in competition law or economics." Is this
>> it?
>
>> --c.a.
>
>> On 07/26/2012 06:05 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>>> I made some comments. I have some serious problems with two of
>>> the things in the statement as it now stands:
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message----- From: NCSG-Discuss
>>>> [mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of joy
>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 1:08 AM To:
>>>> NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] NCUC
>>>> input on new gTLDs and human rights
>>>>
>>> Hi all - following on from the NCUC discussions on this list
>>> and at the recent meeting in Prague, NCUC agreed to develop a
>>> comment on new gTLDs and human rights. The open comment period
>>> closes on 12 August. To start discussion on the comment I've
>>> prepared a draft outline of some key points that can be
>>> developed with inputs from those interested. To do so I've
>>> created a google doc which anyone can view and comment on by
>>> clicking the comment link here:
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/17ijURQYy1uKh27NyDEWh_V1zhCDCIvVtdzUE
>>>
>>>
>
>>>
JLaNmyE/edit
>>>
>>> You do not need a google account to view and comment on this.
>>> I will be monitoring the comments periodically and helping NCUC
>>> to update the comment by the deadline.
>>>
>>> Thanks to those who expressed interest in supporting this
>>> initiative.
>>>
>>> Joy
>>>
>>>
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQKFXIAAoJEA9zUGgfM+bqC08H/RX1PjNXIOG8qOibfehXJL1h
+yNmfPCKpCci7ltIdnLn5By7doneF/7r0FyVnYSA0yusR1iBQOqjMBWlEIcKChnO
sI2Bz5Yri+d84gSBpD1+g7eLh6jDTlB7BnDjioaIIa2N7ZeE2/9BrgH8ezzws/nC
97Aas6w9Y7TNvGIyjWXQDA6LpZ4gQGMEOzziEUJFJEqnaieaR5/xAFA+Mj+ESVE8
9L5b1ODPBgFanfL/uwPqLvtLgLj0h4VbiSLA80XJrQlVHTaMc5UpQWR60GUMbPQO
fBwKmAKIj8f6Gb/UxwRuA+bvHKpQc20/1vV6/RNI+8E1z6cBj/CC/BIGQEq6w0Y=
=spV/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list