Update on IOC/RC issue: motion proposed by NCSG for PDP

klaus.stoll klaus.stoll at CHASQUINET.ORG
Sat Apr 7 18:36:42 CEST 2012


Dear Friends

Greetings. I think we need to limit the possibility to an absolute minimum, (UN + 10 max), IF ANY !, everything else will as Avri says open up the flood gates and make the whole gTLD system unmanageable because there will we hundreds if not thousands of exceptions and an equal number of legal actions for those who think they deserve them.

Yours

Klaus

From: Robin Gross 
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2012 5:51 PM
To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU 
Subject: Re: Update on IOC/RC issue: motion proposed by NCSG for PDP

Thanks.  I thought we were going to add "IF ANY" to the clause asking about what other orgs deserve such rights?  I worry that we are inviting a flood gate of requests for privileges by assuming there will be others (rather than ask the question IF there should be others first). 

Robin



On Apr 6, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu wrote:


  Hello everyone,

  The NCSG Policy Committee agreed that, in view of the passage of the motion which adopted the IOC-RC Drafting Team's recommendations for first-round protections for the IOC and RC, the GNSO should consider additional protections - including any that might apply to other international governmental organizations (IGOs) who have requested similar protections - through a full Policy Development Process (PDP) rather than through an ad-hoc drafting team.

  Accordingly, we proposed a motion that will be discussed at the upcoming GNSO Council meeting next week on Thursday 12 April. Coincidentally, a similar (but not identical) motion was also proposed by Thomas Rickert, the Nominating Committee appointee to the Contracted Parties' House. Both motions can be viewed at https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+12+April+2012.

  Between now and the Council meeting, we'll be discussing with Thomas ways to combine both motions so that the Council need only vote on one unified motion. Early indications are that the concept is acceptable to some of the other Council members, so I'm hopeful that if we can successfully fuse both motions, there is a fair chance of its passage.

  Cheers
  Mary


  Mary W S Wong
  Professor of Law
  Chair, Graduate IP Programs
  Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
  UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
  Two White Street
  Concord, NH 03301
  USA
  Email: mary.wong at law.unh.edu
  Phone: 1-603-513-5143
  Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
  Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20120407/642331f0/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list