for Debbie: Explaining votes made while representing NCSG while on GNSO Council

[Alex Gakuru]

Debbie,

Perhaps you may also wish to correct the impression created by your below
message (re: "If re-elected") considering that you were never elected
Councillor to represent NCSG but have been a Board appointed to represent
NCSG, therefore, you are now seeking to be elected for the first time?

Sincerely,

Alex

On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Debra Hughes <HughesDeb at usa.redcross.org>wrote:
If reelected, my role as a NCSG Councilor will be to continue to
represent the organizational and operational perspective of global
noncommercial users within the NCSG, in close collaboration with the
other NCSG Councilors.  I will continue to be a proponent of
noncommercial interests in Working Groups and I will promote the
importance of the noncommercial voice within the ICANN community.  I
will remain accountable to the NCSG by clearly explaining my
perspective, by reaching out to international noncommercial users and
openly participating in policy discussions and conversations about
important issues.  When there are issues where the various noncommercial
voices have common ground, I will support those issues.

Debbie
-----------------

On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org> wrote:

> Debbie,
>
> I listened to the audio<http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-council-20111006-en.mp> of
> yesterday's GNSO Council call and was surprised that you broke with all the
> NCSG GNSO Councilors and instead voted with the Intellectual Property
> Constituency (IPC) against Motion 3 which deals with providing law
> enforcement assistance on addressing criminal activity (at about 1 hr).  The
> IPC stated it would vote against the motion because it did not give law
> enforcement enough of what it wanted (i.e. it was "too soft" and didn't
> collect enough info on people).
>
> Would you be willing to explain to the NCSG why you voted with the IPC
> instead of the NCSG (and the rest of the GNSO Council) on this issue (Motion
> 3) in yesterday's GNSO Council Meeting?
>
> Thank you,
> Robin
>
>
> ** **
> Please find the MP3 recording of the GNSO Council teleconference, held on
> Thursday, 6 October 2011 at:
> http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-council-20111006-en.mp3****
> ** **
> on page****
> http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#oct
>
> *Agenda Item 5: Law Enforcement assistance on addressing criminal activity
> (10 minutes)*
>
> A motion is being made to recommend action by the ICANN Board with regards
> to addressing Internet-based criminal activity.
>
> Motion<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+22+September+2011> deferred
> from 22 September Council meeting
>
> Refer to motion: 3
>
> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+06+October+2011
>
> 5.1 Reading of the motion (Tim Ruiz)
> 5.2 Discussion
>
> 5.3 Vote
>
>
> IP JUSTICE
> Robin Gross, Executive Director
> 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
> p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
> w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin at ipjustice.org
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20111007/3f4c9219/attachment-0001.html>