Seeking your comments: GNSO and ccNSO topics

[kashif akram]

Ahsjku
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone from du

-----Original Message-----
From:         Kerry Brown <kerry at KDBSYSTEMS.COM>
Sender:       NCSG-Discuss <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
Date:         Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:23:08 
To: <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
Reply-To:     Kerry Brown <kerry at KDBSYSTEMS.COM>
Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Seeking your comments: GNSO and ccNSO topics

I have to disagree somewhat with this. You are painting all ccTLD's with the same brush. As a director of CIRA who manage the .ca ccTLD I can say that CIRA listens to all stakeholders and takes their views into account when creating policy. I know many other ccTLDs do as well. Of course many don't as they are either run more like a commercial  gTLD or closely controlled by the state. I think overall you'll find the ccTLDs are very diverse with many different governance models. It is very hard to make generalizations because of this.

Personally I would like to see increased interaction between all the ICANN councils, constituencies, and stakeholders. That I think most of us agree on.

Kerry Brown

> -----Original Message-----
> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf
> Of Konstantinos Komaitis
> Sent: November-10-11 2:19 AM
> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Seeking your comments: GNSO and ccNSO
> topics
> 
> We definitely need to engage more with the ccNSO - from what I have
> observed the ccNSO is mainly exposed to discussions with a limited number
> of stakeholders and mainly law enforcement agencies. So, they are only
> listening to one side of the story and ultimately they tend to forget/don't
> care/don't consider important the implications their policies have on non-
> commercial users, fair use and free speech. So, I definitely support a more
> robust interaction between the two councils and also I suggest we, as NCSG,
> start approaching the ccNSO for more in depth discussions.
> 
> KK
> 
> Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,
> 
> Senior Lecturer,
> Director of Postgraduate Instructional Courses Director of LLM Information
> Technology and Telecommunications Law University of Strathclyde, The Law
> School, Graham Hills building,
> 50 George Street, Glasgow G1 1BA
> UK
> tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306
> http://www.routledgemedia.com/books/The-Current-State-of-Domain-
> Name-Regulation-isbn9780415477765
> Selected publications:
> http://hq.ssrn.com/submissions/MyPapers.cfm?partid=501038
> Website: www.komaitis.org
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf
> Of Robin Gross
> Sent: Πέμπτη, 10 Νοεμβρίου 2011 1:52 πμ
> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Seeking your comments: GNSO and ccNSO
> topics
> 
> Thanks, Andrew.  However, this might a good reason to open a dialogue with
> ccNSO on this issue and to bring to bear some of these issues and concerns
> of registrants when these take-downs happen outside of due process.  So
> while we (NCSG) might be coming from a different perspective than ccNSO,
> we could both benefit from hearing the issues and concerns from the other
> and trying to find some common ground where possible.
> 
> Thanks,
> Robin
> 
> 
> On Nov 9, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Andrew A. Adams wrote:
> 
> >> Dear all,
> >> As some of you may be aware, there are moves to strengthen the
> >> cooperation = between the ccNSO and GNSO. Ideas are being canvassed
> >> for suggestions on po= ssible areas for interaction. A question:
> >> would the issue of domain name ta= kedown might be a good one to
> >> suggest for joint ccNSO GNSO work? Especially= given the recent
> >> Verisign episode, it is not just a ccTLD issue. Lots of d= ifferences
> >> between the GNSO and ccNSO but takedowns have some significant i=
> >> ssues in terms of the rights of registrants that would echo across both
> and= likely to be of increasing focus =85..
> >> Thoughts?
> >
> > With Nominet dealing with this in the UK as well, it's clear that
> > there is common ground between ccNSO and GNSO here. However, I am
> > concerned that cc delegates may be more easily influenced by
> > censorship-happy governments and that this might leave us with less
> > protection for freedom of speech in the generic name space than we might
> otherwise have.
> >
> > --
> > Professor Andrew A Adams                      aaa at meiji.ac.jp
> > Professor at Graduate School of Business Administration,  and Deputy
> > Director of the Centre for Business Information Ethics
> > Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan       http://www.a-cubed.info/
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> IP JUSTICE
> Robin Gross, Executive Director
> 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
> p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
> w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin at ipjustice.org