NCUC agenda => NCSG Interest Groups

Marc Perkel marc at CHURCHOFREALITY.ORG
Mon Nov 7 22:46:24 CET 2011


I agree as well. Lets do something substantive that will make the
history books.

On 11/7/2011 1:28 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> Amen, Robin.
> This is exactly right.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf
>> Of Robin Gross
>> Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 12:20 PM
>> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] NCUC agenda =>  NCSG Interest Groups
>>
>> I think a lot of people are more interested in working on substantive policy
>> issues than in spending their time in constituency building exercises.  And if
>> we tell them they have to create a constituency first, then we lose a lot of
>> energy and expertise that is only concerned with the substantive policy
>> issues that noncommercial users face.  I think it is important not to
>> discourage those who would prefer to focus on the substantive policy issues
>> by requiring them to go form a constituency.  A flexible lightweight IG can
>> serve this purpose.
>>
>> Robin
>>


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list