Motion on RAA
Nicolas Adam
nickolas.adam at GMAIL.COM
Wed Nov 2 18:20:17 CET 2011
So that means rewriting points
I-[LEA proposed] amendments to RAA
1,
2 (?),
9,
10 (3),
Thx for your lead on this Milton.
Nicolas
On 31/10/2011 8:24 AM, Wendy Seltzer wrote:
> Most of these, we could accept, but not the ones cracking down on
> privacy and proxy services, requiring full verification of registrant
> WHOIS data, and holding registrars liable for abuse.
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list