Motion on RAA

Nicolas Adam nickolas.adam at GMAIL.COM
Wed Nov 2 18:20:17 CET 2011


So that means rewriting points
I-[LEA proposed] amendments to RAA
1,
2 (?),
9,
10 (3),

Thx for your lead on this Milton.

Nicolas


On 31/10/2011 8:24 AM, Wendy Seltzer wrote:
> Most of these, we could accept, but not the ones cracking down on
> privacy and proxy services, requiring full verification of registrant
> WHOIS data, and holding registrars liable for abuse.


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list