[ncsg-policy] RE: Draft of statement for workshop on new gTLDs

[Alex Gakuru]

Dear Avri, KK, Robin, Mary, and all

The proposed Consumer Constituency's (draft) charter principally
reinforces our parent NCUC/SG policy positions - i.e. neither opposed
nor silence. This thinking leads me to state that we (CC) are in
support of this position.

Kind regards,

Alex

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:20 PM,  <HughesDeb at usa.redcross.org> wrote:
> Avri, Konstantinos, Robin and Mary,
>
> Thank you so much for working on this draft under such a tight deadline.
>
>
> I have not had the opportunity to discuss with my NPOC colleagues, but
> after my review this morning, I think it would be best if this was
> submitted as a NCUC statement, or perhaps a joint statement between NCUC
> and the proposed Consumer Const, if they approve.  I think it is
> important for this viewpoint to be shared, even if I and my NPOC
> colleagues do not support the conclusions and content.  I would ask that
> you clearly state the statement does not represent those of the members
> of the Proposed Not-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency.
>
> From the perspective of a non-profit organization that needs effective
> and efficient and reasonable means to execute and protect its
> philanthropic, capacity-building and humanitarian activities online
> (underscored by nefarious activity occurring now related to the disaster
> in Japan and the pacific area) I have serious concerns supporting the
> positions taken related to Section 6, among other areas - although I
> acknowledge the difference in perspectives.
>
> Thanks,
> Debbie
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri at ltu.se]
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 11:58 AM
> To: ncsg-policy at n4c.eu Committee
> Cc: NCSG Members List
> Subject: [ncsg-policy] Draft of statement for workshop on new gTLDs
>
> Hi,
>
> With some help and some editing, I have the draft of the statement I
> intend to use, should a statement be what is mandated.
>
> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Board-GAC+Workshop+S
> corecard+March+2011
>
> I have not finished the table at the bottom  yet, but will be working on
> that during the meeting.
>
> Please discuss the wording, and in so far as we have consensus or rough
> consensus on wording changes, I will make changes.  The views in this
> have been generated from previous positions NCSG has taken in statements
> and elsewhere.  The original ratings were done with the help of
> Konstantinos and Robin.  They have been reviewed by Mary.
>
>
> a.
>
>
>
>
> ----
> Everything about this list: http://info.n4c.eu/sympa/info/ncsg-policy
>