NCUC Comments on UDRP

[Nicolas Adam]

It renders well the idea that the merits of having a review process are
conceptually independent from the merits of various policy positions
that may or may not be articulated during such a process.

It makes an elegant case for (more) evidence-based policy-making. It
ties it to good governance and already existing processes.

I'm happy to support this and i thank the authors for their good work
and precious time.

Nicolas


On 7/13/2011 4:48 PM, Joly MacFie wrote:
>
> From Danny Younger:
>
>  There is one line in the Statement, however, which is inaccurate --
> namely the claim that the UDRP has not been previously reviewed.  From
> 2001 to 2003, a review of the UDRP was conducted by the DNSO.
> This "UDRP Review and Evaluation" continued until the Chair of the
> Task Force (the IPC's J. Scott Evans) resigned under mysterious
> circumstances -- see
> http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-udrp/Arc00/
> <http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-udrp/Arc00/msg00575.html>msg00575.html
> <http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-udrp/Arc00/msg00575.html>
>
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
> WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
> http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
>  VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20110713/6ea64961/attachment-0001.html>