FW: [ncsg-policy] Draft NCSG comments to GNSO Council on Rec 6

[Dwi Elfrida Martina S]

Hi milton..

Thanks, this explanation can become our statement to the ICANN, we have to
state to the ICANN that we strongly suggest ICANN only play their role for
registration of domain name & evaluation the criteria, AND The authority
to evaluate the content of the websites will belong to each local
government.

Regards,


Dwi




 Dwi,
> It is good to get some viewpoint from you.
>
> .xxx is a top level domain proposal specifically for "adult" or
> pornographic content.
>
> Most of us support creating it because we don't want ICANN to decide what
> content should be visible on the Internet; we prefer to have users and/or
> local governments do that. That is what N. Adams meant by "openness and
> freedom"
>
> The .xxx issue is mostly decided now. ICANN's Board has decided that it
> did meet the criteria for creating a sponsored TLD; the Independent Review
> Process has decided that the 2007 reversal of that decision was wrong; the
> ICANN Board has decided to move ahead now. Only the GAC seems to have any
> objection.
>
> Let me ask you about this:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> No, I am not exist in two
>> parties. I was asked by my office to replace my boses in GAC meeting.
>> But now, I am free from my job, as I have to start my study in
>> Massachusetts. and in this time, I really interest to involve in NCSG.
>
> I notice that your domain name is still part of the government of
> Indonesia: depkominfo.go.id
> Will that change soon?
>
> --MM
>