Open letter to ICANN from the Legal Counsels of intergovernmental organizations

Nicolas Adam nickolas.adam at GMAIL.COM
Thu Dec 22 16:44:24 CET 2011


I agree with McTim ;).

Nicolas

On 22/12/2011 8:44 AM, McTim wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
> <mailto:avri at acm.org>> wrote:
> .
> .
> .
>
>     I tend to think we should be removing names, such as ICANN/IANA
>     etc, from the reserved list, not adding them.  But we had a WG
>     during the new gTLD PDP that did not make these decisions - either
>     for adding or deleting.    So I find all of the efforts to add
>     names now, problematic and to be avoided unless we open up a PDP
>     process that looks at the entire issue again, including all the
>     geo names that ICANN has forced onto the list without a PDP to
>     authorize the action.
>
>
>
> I agree with Avri.
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
> route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20111222/6ec8b029/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list