<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
I agree with McTim ;).<br>
<br>
Nicolas<br>
<br>
On 22/12/2011 8:44 AM, McTim wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CACAaNxgk8LPHwtPvw2XktnLDbHs6peXVAd+0DG7s+JzL-H97pg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Avri
Doria <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</a>></span>
wrote:</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">.</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
.</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">.<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I tend to think we should be removing names, such as
ICANN/IANA etc, from the reserved list, not adding them. But
we had a WG during the new gTLD PDP that did not make these
decisions - either for adding or deleting. So I find all of
the efforts to add names now, problematic and to be avoided
unless we open up a PDP process that looks at the entire issue
again, including all the geo names that ICANN has forced onto
the list without a PDP to authorize the action.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I agree with Avri.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
-- <br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
McTim<br>
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is.
A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>