Role of Liaisons was Re: [] New GTLDs: ...

[Nicolas Adam]

Exchanging, in an argumentative manner. Is argument (arguing) always connoting an idea of hard feelings in Poe's idiom? In other words, can one say "I had an argument with x" and merely mean that views of opposing nature were exchanged and "argued" upon? Or does it most always imply fractitious disagreement?

N

Please excuse my mobile brevity.

-----Original Message-----
From: "Nicolas Adam" <nickolas.adam at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:21:59 
To: Evan Leibovitch<evan at telly.org>; <evanleibovitch at gmail.com>
Reply-To: nickolas.adam at gmail.com
Cc: <NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
Subject: Re: Role of Liaisons was Re: [] New GTLDs: ...

Indeed. "Exchanging" was the idea I wished to convey.

Cheers.

N

Please excuse my mobile brevity.

-----Original Message-----
From: Evan Leibovitch <evan at telly.org>
Sender: evanleibovitch at gmail.com
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:51:40 
To: Nicolas Adam<nickolas.adam at gmail.com>
Cc: <NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
Subject: Re: Role of Liaisons was Re: [] New GTLDs: ...

Hi Nicolas,



> OTOH, i felt more than comfortable arguing with Evan, thereby
> understanding ALAC's set of positions.
>


Thank you ... I think. :-)

If there's a genuine desire to exchange views and learn from the others --
rather than just scoring debating points or being insulting -- it's not an
argument.

- Evan

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20111213/06af73f8/attachment-0001.html>