<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"><html><head><meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"></head><body>Exchanging, in an argumentative manner. Is argument (arguing) always connoting an idea of hard feelings in Poe's idiom? In other words, can one say "I had an argument with x" and merely mean that views of opposing nature were exchanged and "argued" upon? Or does it most always imply fractitious disagreement?<br/><br/>N<br/><div>Please excuse my mobile brevity.</div><hr/><div><b>From: </b> "Nicolas Adam" <nickolas.adam@gmail.com>
</div><div><b>Date: </b>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:21:59 +0000</div><div><b>To: </b>Evan Leibovitch<evan@telly.org>; <evanleibovitch@gmail.com></div><div><b>ReplyTo: </b> nickolas.adam@gmail.com
</div><div><b>Cc: </b><NCSG-DISCUSS@listserv.syr.edu></div><div><b>Subject: </b>Re: Role of Liaisons was Re: [] New GTLDs: ...</div><div><br/></div>Indeed. "Exchanging" was the idea I wished to convey.<br/><br/>Cheers.<br/><br/>N<br/><div>Please excuse my mobile brevity.</div><hr/><div><b>From: </b> Evan Leibovitch <evan@telly.org>
</div><div><b>Sender: </b> evanleibovitch@gmail.com
</div><div><b>Date: </b>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:51:40 -0500</div><div><b>To: </b>Nicolas Adam<nickolas.adam@gmail.com></div><div><b>Cc: </b><NCSG-DISCUSS@listserv.syr.edu></div><div><b>Subject: </b>Re: Role of Liaisons was Re: [] New GTLDs: ...</div><div><br/></div>Hi Nicolas,<div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">OTOH, i felt more than comfortable arguing with Evan, thereby understanding ALAC's set of positions.<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Thank you ... I think. :-)</div><div><br></div><div>If there's a genuine desire to exchange views and learn from the others -- rather than just scoring debating points or being insulting -- it's not an argument.</div>
<div><br></div><div>- Evan</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div>
</body></html>