FW: [] PDP review

[Milton L Mueller]

Reposted for Mary

From: Mary Wong [mailto:Mary.Wong at law.unh.edu]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 11:39 AM
To: NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu
Subject: Re: [] PDP review

I wish I'd been able to do more than glance at the proposal, but the possibility of anything more got buried under the usual day job, other ICANN work, conferences and papers that were already piled up :(

I still think we should send in some comments, though, so I will try to write up something brief later today if I possibly can. Would it be too late then to circulate to the list for approval, though?

Best,
Mary

Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mary.wong at law.unh.edu<mailto:mary.wong at law.unh.edu>
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584


>>>
From:

Avri Doria <avri at LTU.SE>

To:

<NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>

Date:

9/30/2010 11:31 AM

Subject:

Re: [] PDP review

And today is the last day.
Does nobody in this SG have time for this issue?
  Or do we just not care.

a.


On 24 Sep 2010, at 15:57, Alex Gakuru wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> We could really do with an NCUC/SG comment to PDP-WT. All others have commented except us. This is to only to support Avri's appeal on this.
>
> thanks.
>
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Avri Doria <avri at ltu.se> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Once again in a PDP meeting.  Once again asked it thee would be a comment from the NCSG.
>
> Comment period close 30 September.  For real this time.  Enough extensions already.
>
> We still do not have a volunteer to actually do a report.  Lots of people have volunteered to review one, but someone has to do the initial work.  Alex and I are parts of the group so I do not feel we can take the lead.
>
> I still think this is a critical piece of policy process we really should review as a SG.
>
> I entreat you all, please take a look at: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#pdp-initial-report
>
> and comment.  Please also let me/the_list if you are doing this.
>
> Thanks
>
> a.
>
>
>
> On 2 Sep 2010, at 10:05, Avri Doria wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am sitting in the PDP work team meeting and was asked whether we intend to submit a review to the new PDP processes.
> >
> > http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#pdp-initial-report
> >
> > Is anyone willing?  The deadline has been moved for one last extension to Sept 30.
> >
> > BTW: I am on the WT and thus even if I wanted to comment, i don't believe I should be the one to do so. i tend to believe that those in a group have enough opportunity to make their points and comments should be generated by others.  I think this stuff s important to NCSG since that is how all of the policy gets made and these changes may have an effect on how we work.
> >
> > a.
> >
>
>
>
> ----
> Everything about this list: http://info.n4c.eu/sympa/info/ncsg-policy
>
>
>
> --
> regards,
>
> Alex Gakuru
> http://www.mwenyeji.com
> Hosting, surprise yourself!





As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of New Hampshire School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have changed and now follow the convention: firstname.lastname at law.unh.edu. For more information on the University of New Hampshire School of Law, please visit law.unh.edu<http://law.unh.edu>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20100930/08d51716/attachment.html>