[ncsg-policy] RE: Statement on Rec6

Alex Gakuru gakuru at GMAIL.COM
Fri Oct 22 17:58:56 CEST 2010


I support this statement's endorsement by the NCSG.

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

> The ALAC statement is perfect as far as I am concerned - it could have been
> written by us.
> Do let's endorse it
> --MM
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri at ltu.se]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 5:00 PM
> > To: NCSG-Policy; NCSG Members List
> > Subject: [ncsg-policy] Statement on Rec6
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The ALAC is putting out a statement on the Rec6 recommendations.
> >
> > I don't see us doing one by tomorrow.
> >
> > How about we endorse their statement?
> >
> > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/gTLD+WG+-
> > +ALAC+Draft+Statement+on+Rec+6+CWG+Report
> >
> > any objections?
> >
> > a.
>
>
>
> ----
> Everything about this list: http://info.n4c.eu/sympa/info/ncsg-policy
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20101022/3e3622ab/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list