[ncsg-policy] NCSG mtg with the ICANN Board.

[Alex Gakuru]

Of course, I suppose that we all suggesting different issues for
amalgamation then consideration if, which, how and who to raise them with
Board..

On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:02 PM, William Drake <
william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch> wrote:

> I didn't mean talk about interest groups out of the context of the larger
> framework, so we are on the same page.
>
>
> On Mar 6, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>
> I agree with Mary that you shouldn’t tag the agenda to something as narrow
> as SIGs. The NCSG charter progress is the key issue, and the Consumer
> constituency and IGs within NCSG can be covered within that framework.
>
>
> *From:* Non-Commercial User Constituency [mailto:
> NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Mary Wong
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 06, 2010 7:30 AM
> *To:* NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> *Subject:* Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] [ncsg-policy] NCSG mtg with the ICANN Board.
>
>
> While I agree that the consumer interest group (and broader relationship
> with the proposed consumers constituency) issue is important to us and
> should be discussed, I think the discussion should take place within the
> broader context of "where, when and how the Board sees the progress towards
> a final charter going".
>
> In addition, we could (if time permits) engage the Board in other issues of
> some importance to our group and the non-commercial community, e.g. ensuring
> adequate representation on each of the AoC Review Teams and the
> difficulties/need for support (financial and staff) for even more outreach
> activities.
>
> Cheers
> Mary
>
> *Mary W S Wong*
> Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> Franklin Pierce Law Center
> Two White Street
> Concord, NH 03301
> USA
> Email: mwong at piercelaw.edu
> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
> Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN)
> at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>
>
> >>>
> *From:*
> Alex Gakuru <gakuru at GMAIL.COM>
> *To:*
> <NCUC-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
> *Date:*
> 3/6/2010 7:16 AM
> *Subject:*
> Re: [ncsg-policy] NCSG mtg with the ICANN Board.
> I agree - just the consumer agenda from me.
>
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 3:09 PM, William Drake
> <william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch> wrote:
> > why not try to really draw them out on whether our interest group
> approach is really definitely ok and we can proceed, and if so the relevance
> to consumer etc
> >
> > On Mar 6, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The Board has confirmed that they will meet with the NCSG during our
> Tuesday meeting from 11:15 - 12:15.
> >>
> >> They have asked whether we have any specific agenda items we can send
> them beforehand.
> >>
> >> Suggestions?
> >>
> >> thanks
> >>
> >> a.
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> ***********************************************************
> William J. Drake
> Senior Associate
> Centre for International Governance
> Graduate Institute of International and
>   Development Studies
> Geneva, Switzerland
> william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch
> www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
> ***********************************************************
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20100306/2e234574/attachment.html>