NOT for GNSO --> Fwd: EXTENSION OF DEADLINE - Call for Applicants for a Position of Volunteer Review Team Member - 29 July 2010

[William Drake]

Hi Milton

While I understand your sentiment, I don't see how remaining aloof would have been helpful in this case. The decision was well worth challenging on procedural grounds, and now people here and elsewhere will have more time to apply.  

Best,

Bill

On Jul 16, 2010, at 7:27 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:

> I view this as a tempest in a teapot, and think we should avoid getting dragged into CSG-led issues like this when the root cause is just their own internal squabbling.
> (dontcha just love having multiple constituencies?)
>  
> From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of William Drake
> 
>  
> I agree with Avri and just wrote to Council saying Chuck's proposal doesn't work.  CSG is also quite unhappy with it.  I don't see how it can stand if at least half the Council's saying no.
>  
> This wouldn't be happening in the first place if our housemates were able to sort out their endorsements in less than 21 days (from currently just six GNSO candidates for the WHOIS group and five for SSR…)  Chuck was trying to recalibrate the GNSO's time line to accommodate theirs.
>  


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20100717/762d4222/attachment.html>