Comment periods / DAG4

Thu Jul 22 17:42:44 CEST 2010

I agree with Wendy's suggestion and I would like to encourage our members to read the comments and if they agree to submit their endorsements. It is very important that we show our interest in the discussions on DAG4 by endorsing the comments submitted by NCUC-ers, as there are many issues that we have been discussing in this list during this whole process.

KK

Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,
Law Lecturer,
Director of Postgraduate Instructional Courses
University of Strathclyde,
The Law School,
The Lord Hope Building,
141 St. James Road,
Glasgow, G4 0LT
UK
tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306
http://www.routledgemedia.com/books/The-Current-State-of-Domain-Name-Regulation-isbn9780415477765
Selected publications: http://hq.ssrn.com/submissions/MyPapers.cfm?partid=501038
Website: http://domainnamelaw.ning.com/

-----Original Message-----
From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 3:33 PM
To: NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Subject: Re: Comment periods / DAG4

NCSG and NCSG-Policy:

Could we please compile a list of the comments members have submitted on 
DAG4 for which we might seek Stakeholder Group endorsement, and then 
take whatever steps necessary to determine whether to endorse them?  I 
believe that such endorsement would be accepted even though the comment 
period has closed.

I know Konstantinos, Mary, Robin, Avri, Debbie, and I have submitted 
comments, and I'm sure others have as well.  I have not reviewed the 
full list, and do not know whether all authors would seek SG 
endorsement.  How should we proceed?

Thanks,
--Wendy

On 07/21/2010 03:16 PM, Mary Wong wrote:
> Likewise (it's now 3.15 a.m. in Singapore :) and I apologize once again for not
> having been able to circulate my draft comments before today.
> I support Wendy's and Avri's earlier suggestion for each of us to send in the
> comments individually.
> I also encourage NCSG and NCUC members to log on to
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/4gtld-guide/ to endorse comments with which they
> agree. At the moment, Wendy, my and Konstantinos' comments are already up.
> Thanks,
> Mary
> *Mary W S Wong*
> Professor of Law&  Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> Franklin Pierce Law Center
> Two White Street
> Concord, NH 03301
> USA
> Email: mwong at piercelaw.edu<mailto:mwong at piercelaw.edu>
> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
> Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
> http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>
>   >>>
> *From: * 	Konstantinos Komaitis<k.komaitis at STRATH.AC.UK>
> *To:* 	<NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
> *Date: * 	7/21/2010 1:16 PM
> *Subject: * 	Re: Comment periods
>
> It is pretty late here and I don't have time to compile the comments myself.
> However, please use them as part of NCUC's submission. I will be also submitting
> these in my own capacity.
>
> KK
>
>
> On 21/07/2010 17:59, "Robin Gross"<robin at ipjustice.org>  wrote:
>
> I haven't written anything myself and was hoping to provide comments and sign-on
> to a group statement.
>
> If there isn't enough time to get NCSG support for a consolidated set of
> comments, we can probably get NCUC support and submit them as such.
>
> Perhaps what we need at this point is for KK, Mary,&  Wendy's comments to be
> consolidated into a single statement the group can support (either NCUC or NCSG).
>
> Anyone want to take a stab at consolidation of the various parts in the next few
> hours?
>
> Thanks,
> Robin
>
>
>
> On Jul 21, 2010, at 8:26 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Well we certainly don't have time for a vote, and this does fall under their
> responsibility for a NCSG statement as defined in the charter we approved.
>
>
> Discussion and development of substantive policies and statements issued in the
> name of the NCSG. This activity will require coordination with the membership
> and the Interest-Groups;
>
>
>
> Of course the constituency and candidate constituency/interest-groups can also
> submit one under their names according to their various procedures.
>
> And the individuals can submit, under their names and the names of their
> organizations.
>
> a.
>
> On 21 Jul 2010, at 11:18, Wendy Seltzer wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Avri.
>
> Group, what procedures do we want to follow for submitting comments, especially
> for those due today on DAG4 (where we have several distinct segments)? Should we
> each submit what we've written individually, and follow up with NCSG endorsement
> if the policy council approves? (as Avri suggested in response to another thread)
>
> --Wendy
>
> On 07/21/2010 11:08 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> just did a quick update of the comment list on the wiki
>
> https://st.icann.org/ncsg-ec/index.cgi?comment_periods_and_volunteers
>
> noticed a lot of things were ending today. tough there have been a few
> extensions in general.
>
>
> a.
>
>
>
> Pierce Law | University of New Hampshire - An Innovative Partnership
> <http://www.piercelaw.edu/>
-- 
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org
Fellow, Silicon Flatirons Center at University of Colorado Law School
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
http://www.chillingeffects.org/
https://www.torproject.org/