[ncsg-policy] Re: How's this (edited motion on VI)

[Milton L Mueller]

From: Non-Commercial User Constituency [NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of Rosemary Sinclair
>
>Until things change....they stay as they are....
>
Ah but that's exactly the problem, Rosemary. What exactly is allowed now by things "as they are?"

Registrars and staff are claiming (with quite a few facts to support their case) that JM/CO is allowed now by "the way things are" and DAGv3 is "implementation."

Registries are claiming that DAGv3 is a policy change and is not part of the "way things are."

So your position that we only need a single, gigantic PDP to resolve all issues related to VI basically means that it would take 3-4 years to answer this question, right? And what happens to the TLD cartel in the meantime? Is it leeft in place?

--MM


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20100124/01e2e93b/attachment.html>