Final motions on VI

[Milton L Mueller]

Gotta have a Drafting Team to charter the WG, given all the conversy about definitions and what is in and out of scope.

My reading of late night mail exchanges indicates that some councilors are fully prepared to support the Mary/Mike revision.  I doubt anyone in the US is awake at this hour, but if someone could clarify for me the thinking behind a) WG but not a DT to charter the WG and b) WG report in 90 days rather than something more realistic, I'd appreciate it.  Not sure at present which to vote for, both have problems.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20100128/33bc6c8f/attachment.html>