Fwd: ALAC comment on the Proposed Applicant Guidebook

[Milton L Mueller]

I find myself in complete agreement with the ALAC statement on the crucial issues of the DRSP, the Independent Objector and the illegitimate role of the staff in setting policy. I cannot fathom why Wendy would want to approve the AG without modifications. Can you explain? 
--MM

> -----Original Message-----
> From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Wendy Seltzer
> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 1:36 PM
> To: NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> Subject: Re: [NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: ALAC comment on the Proposed
> Applicant Guidebook
> 
> I would not endorse the conclusion of this statmeent.
> 
> In particular, I personally disagree with the statement that "we must
> regretfully but categorically state that we consider the current PAG to
> be unacceptable as presented, and against the best interest of Internet
> end-users."  I would urge the approval of the AG now.
> 
> --Wendy
> 
> On 12/06/2010 12:01 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
> >
> > Evan has asked the NCCG/NCUC to consider endorsing the ALAC statement.
> >
> > They expect to vote on it tomorrow, and Evan has indicated willingness
> to come in and speak to us.
> >
> >>
> >>
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Draft+ALAC+Statement+on+Draf
> t+Final+Applicant+Guidebook
> >
> > a.
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org +1 914-374-0613
> Fellow, Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy
> Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
> http://www.chillingeffects.org/
> https://www.torproject.org/donate        <<        please donate!
> http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/