Endorsing American Red Cross' Comments on VI Initial Report

[Rafik Dammak]

Hello,

first thanks to Debbie for her comments and keeping doing that,
we should undoubtedly follow her example :)

honestly, I am becoming uncomfortable that we have every time to deal with
 one-day-before-deadline-written comments and then being pushed in policy
committee to make quick decision, I understand that people who volunteer to
draft comment are really busy with their professional duties. in order to
allow our members to react, one week before deadline sounds suitable and
fair (anyway I am not blaming anybody about that, mea culpa as I didn't make
my homework of comments too).

I agree with third option . I understand that Milton's explanatory part is
appropriate for first option?

Regards

Rafik

2010/8/13 Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu>

> The only problem with a "full" endorsement by NCSG is that it might imply
> that Debbie's comments address the _only_ issues we care about as NCSG.
> There are a broad range of other issues her comments don't address.
>
> We might solve this by attaching to our endorsement the following proviso:
>
> "The NSCG is deeply concerned about a number of issues raised by the VI WG.
> Lacking the time to develop a more complete statement touching on all those
> issues, we fully support the comments of the American Red Cross on the issue
> of exceptions for Single-Registrant, Single-User TLD applications, and their
> comments regarding criteria for an exceptions procedure."
>
> --MM
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf
> > Of Avri Doria
> > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 12:20 PM
> > To: NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> > Subject: Re: [NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS] Endorsing American Red Cross' Comments
> > on VI Initial Report
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I believe the Policy-committee could make the decision to endorse if
> > they had a consensus, especially if no one on the public lists has
> > objections.
> >
> > I am fine with being a signatory to your third option.
> >
> > a.
> >
> >
> > On 12 Aug 2010, at 12:11, Mary Wong wrote:
> >
> > > I echo Avri's thanks, Debbie, and agree that NCSG should discuss
> > whether it can support and endorse the comments submitted by the Red
> > Cross.
> > >
> > > Speaking personally, I would be happy to.
> > >
> > > In view of the fact that today is the last day, I guess the group's
> > options are:
> > > - Endorse in full (if sufficient members can agree) as an SG
> > > - Endorse in part as an SG
> > > - Endorsement (either in full or in part) by a group of members
> > (starting with Avri, me and whoever else wants to sign on) identifying
> > ourselves as NCSG members (or as non-commercial interests)
> > > - No endorsement of any kind
> > >
> > > It may be that the third option would be the quickest and easiest.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Mary
> > >
> > > Mary W S Wong
> > > Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> > > Franklin Pierce Law Center
> > > Two White Street
> > > Concord, NH 03301
> > > USA
> > > Email: mwong at piercelaw.edu
> > > Phone: 1-603-513-5143
> > > Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
> > > Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network
> > (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
> > >
> > >
> > > >>>
> > > From:       Avri Doria <avri at LTU.SE>
> > > To: <NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
> > > Date:       8/12/2010 11:23 AM
> > > Subject:    Re: American Red Cross' Comments on Initial Report on
> > Vertical Integration Between Registrars and Registries
> > > On 12 Aug 2010, at 09:39, Debra Hughes wrote:
> > >
> > > > <American Red Cross Comments to VI Report - 08122010.pdf>
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Thanks for writing and sending this.  Having just read it, I am
> > wondering whether this is a comment that the NCSG would be willing to
> > endorse?
> > >
> > > Personally, and as a member of the VIWG, I ver much appreciate this
> > comment and do hope we can endorse it.
> > >
> > > Are any other comments in the offing?
> > >
> > > Today is the deadline.
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > a.
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20100813/7032999a/attachment-0001.html>