Endorsing American Red Cross' Comments on VI Initial Report

[Carlos A. Afonso]

Agreed.

--c.a.

On 08/12/2010 03:13 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> The only problem with a "full" endorsement by NCSG is that it might imply that Debbie's comments address the _only_ issues we care about as NCSG. There are a broad range of other issues her comments don't address.
>
> We might solve this by attaching to our endorsement the following proviso:
>
> "The NSCG is deeply concerned about a number of issues raised by the VI WG. Lacking the time to develop a more complete statement touching on all those issues, we fully support the comments of the American Red Cross on the issue of exceptions for Single-Registrant, Single-User TLD applications, and their comments regarding criteria for an exceptions procedure."
>
> --MM
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf
>> Of Avri Doria
>> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 12:20 PM
>> To: NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>> Subject: Re: [NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS] Endorsing American Red Cross' Comments
>> on VI Initial Report
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I believe the Policy-committee could make the decision to endorse if
>> they had a consensus, especially if no one on the public lists has
>> objections.
>>
>> I am fine with being a signatory to your third option.
>>
>> a.
>>
>>
>> On 12 Aug 2010, at 12:11, Mary Wong wrote:
>>
>>> I echo Avri's thanks, Debbie, and agree that NCSG should discuss
>> whether it can support and endorse the comments submitted by the Red
>> Cross.
>>>
>>> Speaking personally, I would be happy to.
>>>
>>> In view of the fact that today is the last day, I guess the group's
>> options are:
>>> - Endorse in full (if sufficient members can agree) as an SG
>>> - Endorse in part as an SG
>>> - Endorsement (either in full or in part) by a group of members
>> (starting with Avri, me and whoever else wants to sign on) identifying
>> ourselves as NCSG members (or as non-commercial interests)
>>> - No endorsement of any kind
>>>
>>> It may be that the third option would be the quickest and easiest.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Mary
>>>
>>> Mary W S Wong
>>> Professor of Law&  Chair, Graduate IP Programs
>>> Franklin Pierce Law Center
>>> Two White Street
>>> Concord, NH 03301
>>> USA
>>> Email: mwong at piercelaw.edu
>>> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
>>> Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
>>> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network
>> (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>
>>> From:	Avri Doria<avri at LTU.SE>
>>> To:	<NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
>>> Date:	8/12/2010 11:23 AM
>>> Subject:	Re: American Red Cross' Comments on Initial Report on
>> Vertical Integration Between Registrars and Registries
>>> On 12 Aug 2010, at 09:39, Debra Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>>> <American Red Cross Comments to VI Report - 08122010.pdf>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks for writing and sending this.  Having just read it, I am
>> wondering whether this is a comment that the NCSG would be willing to
>> endorse?
>>>
>>> Personally, and as a member of the VIWG, I ver much appreciate this
>> comment and do hope we can endorse it.
>>>
>>> Are any other comments in the offing?
>>>
>>> Today is the deadline.
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> a.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>

--

Carlos A. Afonso
CGI.br (www.cgi.br)
Nupef (www.nupef.org.br)
====================================
new/nuevo/novo e-mail: ca at cafonso.ca
====================================