Fwd: [council] Agenda for GNSO Council Meeting 21 April 2010.
Avri Doria
avri at LTU.SE
Wed Apr 14 16:32:14 CEST 2010
Reminder we have a meeting set the day before.
> Mark your calendar --> Next 3 Calls:
> 20 April (Tue.) @ 21:00 UTC
> 19 May (Wed.) @ 21:00 UTC
> 9 June (Wed.) @ 21:00 UTC
Note I have the recording and transcript from the previous meeting , but have just not had time to put them up on the web site in the area we set aside for them.
Formal details on the call will be found on the web site (don't think they are there yet) and an agenda will be drafted.
In addition to the items on the GNSO agenda and updates on various Working Groups and Working Teams please mention on the list any other items you think need to be covered.
And remember this meeting is open to all NCSG members and is a chance to interact with the NCSG council members before they go and participate on the NCSG's behalf. So join us and get your opinion stated. And if you can't come, comments on the list are good too.
thanks
a.
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen at icann.org>
> Date: 13 April 2010 18:23:15 EDT
> To: "mail=Council at gnso.icann.org" <Council at gnso.icann.org>
> Subject: [council] Agenda for GNSO Council Meeting 21 April 2010.
>
> Agenda for GNSO Council Meeting 21 April 2010.
>
> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-21apr10-en.htm
>
> https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?proposed_agenda_21_april_2010
>
> This agenda was established according to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures approved 28 October 2009 for the GNSO Council.
> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/operating-procedures-revised-draft-clean-09oct09-en.pdf
>
> For convenience:
>
> • An excerpt of the ICANN Bylaws defining the voting thresholds is provided in Appendix 1 at the end of this agenda.
> • An excerpt from the Council Operating Procedures defining the absentee voting procedures is provided in Appendix 2 at the end of this agenda.
>
> Meeting Time 11:00 UTC
>
> See the following and http://www.timeanddate.com/ for other times:
>
> 04:00 PDT; 06:00 CDT; 07:00 EDT; 08:00 Buenos Aires; 08:00 Brazil; 13:00 CEST; 15:00 Moscow; 16:00 Pakistan; 19:00 Hong Kong; 20:00 Tokyo, 21:00 Melbourne
>
> Dial-in numbers will be sent individually to Council members. Councilors should notify the GNSO Secretariat in advance if a dial out call is needed.
>
> Please click on the link to join the GNSO Council Adobe Connect room
> http://icann.na3.acrobat.com/gnsocouncil/
> Please enter as a 'guest'.
>
> Item 1: Administrative matters (10 minutes)
>
> 1.1 Roll call of Council members
>
> 1.2 Update any statements of interest
>
> 1.3 Review/amend agenda
>
> 1.4. Note the status of minutes for the previous Council meeting per the GNSO Operating Procedures:
>
> • 1 April 2010 meeting – Approved 16 April 2010 : (insert URL)
>
> Item 2: GNSO Improvements (20 Minutes)
>
> 2.1 OSC Communication & Coordination (CCT) WT Recommendations
>
> 2.1.1 Refer to CCT WT Report Part 1:
>
> http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/cct-consolidated-report-final-09apr10-en.pdf
>
> 2.1.2 Overview of recommendations (Julie Hedlund)
>
> 2.1.3 Discussion
>
> 2.1.4 Motion:
> https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?21_april_motions
>
> 2.1.5 Vote
>
> 2.2 OCS GNSO Council Operations WT Recommendations
>
> 2.2.1 Overview of recommendations (Julie Hedlund)
>
> 2.2.2 Discussion
>
> 2.2.3 Motion:
> https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?21_april_motions
>
> 2.2.4 Vote
>
> (Note that absentee voting will not be allowed on these motions.)
>
> Item 3: Whois Studies (30 minutes)
>
> 3.1 Refer to:
> • Whois Studies Report:
> https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?whois_discussion#
> http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/whois-studies-report-for-gnso-23mar10-en.pdf
>
> • Public comment site for the Framework for ICANN's FY11 Operating Plan and Budget:
> http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201004-en.htm#op-budget-fy2011
>
> (Note that the comment period ended 1 April 2010.)
>
> • Public comment: Draft NORC Report on Whois Accuracy, (comment period ends 15 April 2010)
>
> Presentation Slides from 1 April 2010 Council meeting:
> http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/whois-studies-presentation-01apr10-en.pdf
>
> Follow-up to WHOIS Studies discussion on 1 April 2010 prepared by Liz Gasster, 5 April 2010:
>
> http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/whois-follow-up-discussion-05apr10-en.pdf
>
> 3.2 Summary of proposals for Whois Study budget requests from the GNSO
>
> 3.3 Discussion
>
> 3.4 Next steps?
>
> • Note that a final budget has to be finished by 17 May and there are currently no funds budgeted for Whois Studies.
>
> Item 4: Prioritization of GNSO work (30 minutes)
>
> 4.1 Refer to Recommendations by the Work Prioritization Model Drafting Team (WPM-DT):
>
> http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/wpmg-section-6-and-annex-09apr10-en.pdf
>
> 4.2 Overview of Recommendations (Olga Cavalli/Ken Bour)
>
> 4.3 Discussion
>
> 4.4 Next steps?
>
> 4.4.1 Motion
>
> https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?21_april_motions4.4.2 Vote
>
> (Note that absentee voting will not be allowed on this motion.)
>
> Item 5: Joint SO/AC WG to develop a sustainable approach to providing support to applicants requiring assistance in applying for and operating new gTLDs (5 Minutes)
>
> 5.1 Status update (Chuck)
>
> So far, GAC and ALAC plan to participate
>
> Olof Nordling will be the lead New gTLD Implementation Team Staff person supporting this WG
>
> 5.2 Request for GNSO participants
>
> Item 6: Other Business (15 minutes)
>
> 6.1 GNSO Comments regarding the FY11 Operating Plan and Budget?
>
> 6.2 AGP Policy overview of Staff report (Craig Schwartz)
>
> 6.2.1 Brief overview of Staff report (Craig Schwartz)
>
> • Should the Council consider modifying the AGP Limits Policy to no longer require semi-annual updates?
>
> • Should the Council consider modifying the AGP Limits Policy by defining the terms “extraordinary circumstances” or “reoccur regularly? For example:
>
> o Should instances of consumer fraud automatically be a legitimate use of AGP deletes?
>
> o If a registrar proactively takes down (i.e., deletes) domains that are known to propagate a fraudulent activity such as phishing, should the registrar bear the cost if
> the deletions cause the registrar to exceed the threshold defined in the Policy?
>
> 6.2.2 Follow-up actions?
>
> 6.3 Mike Rodenbaugh motion regarding the VeriSign .net Registry Services proposal for a Domain Name Exchange service
>
> 6.3.1 Refer to the motion at
>
> https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?21_april_motions6.3.2 Discussion
>
> 6.3.3 Vote
>
> Note that absentee voting will not apply.
>
> 6.4 Any other business?
>
> Item 7 Status updates (5 minutes)
>
> 7.1 Questions/comments on written status updates sent in advance by leaders of Working Groups, Work Teams, staff projects, etc.?
> Status updates:
>
> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/notes-council-21april10-en.htm
>
> Item 8: The updated GNSO Project Status List (5 minutes)
>
> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/pending-projects-list.pdf
>
> 7.1 Questions/comments?
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20100414/83f78d72/attachment.html>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list