ALAC/NCSG letter on secret memo between Staff and Board
Alex Gakuru
gakuru at GMAIL.COM
Fri Apr 2 06:13:03 CEST 2010
I agree, and preferably a review team member with our best interests at
heart..
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Jorge Amodio <jmamodio at gmail.com> wrote:
> Even if for some valid reason confidentiality is required, 1 or more
> members of the review team should be included in the distribution of
> such documents with the premise to act only as observers and keep the
> contents and matters absolutely confidential, that will guarantee more
> transparency even if secrecy for a delicate matter is necessary.
>
> My .02
> Jorge
>
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Avri Doria <avri at ltu.se> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The following is the final version we reached in Nairobi.
> >
> > I have just sent a note to Cheryl asking what comes next.
> >
> > a.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20100402/82d3743c/attachment.html>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list