Proposed new NCSG structure
Robin Gross
robin at IPJUSTICE.ORG
Sat Oct 11 17:17:13 CEST 2008
Hi Milton,
Thanks for posting this. It looks like a solid direction for us to
head in to manage this transition.
So should all existing members of NCUC "join" (or "form") a
constituency within the new stake-holder group?
Thanks much,
Robin
On Oct 9, 2008, at 1:13 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> Hello, all
> Important news about the GNSO Improvements. First, we have no
> official notice yet but the Board has voted to delay the full
> implementation of the Improvements by 3-4 months. This is supposed
> to have happened at the Sept 30 meeting, but we have no description
> of what they decided yet so cannot provide details.
>
> This has implications for our GNSO Council seat elections. It would
> mean that there would be 2 open Council positions instead of 5,
> although one ICANN staff has suggested that we go ahead and elect
> all 5 and keep them “in reserve” (don’t shoot the messenger, I am
> just relaying what I know).
>
> More important, we need to start thinking about the new structure
> for the Noncommercial Stakeholders Group (NCSG). Below is a sketch
> of what I think would work. Please let us know what you think.
>
>
> NCSG structure sketch
>
> Membership
> Eligibility criteria same as before, except we allow individuals
> according to current provisional regime
> Individuals and representatives of organizations join NCSG directly
> Social networking site for interactions and records
> NCUC discuss list retained (but renamed) as NCSG
> discuss list
> 3 categories of membership:
> Large organization – 4 votes
> Small organization – 2 votes
> Individuals – 1 vote
> No membership dues, but renewal required bi-annually
> Chair and GNSO Council reps elected by NCSG members
>
> Officers
> Chair – same duties as NCUC chair
> 6 GNSO Council representatives elected by NCSG
> Executive Committee (EC)
> Consists of Chair, 1 delegate from each constituency, Council
> representatives
> Constituencies represented by their own chair/delegate
>
> Constituencies
> Constituencies are self-defined groups organized around some
> distinctive policy perspective (e.g. consumer protection, privacy);
> shared identity (e.g., region or country of origin, gender,
> language group); a type of organization (e.g., research networks,
> philanthropic foundations) or any other grouping principle that
> might affect its stance on gtld policy.
> Each constituency sets its own eligibility criteria
> Constituencies have a right to:
> x Place one rep on the executive committee
> x Delegate members to working groups
> x Issue statements on PDPs which are included in the official
> NCSG response, but marked as constituency positions, not
> necessarily the position of NCSG as a whole
>
> To be recognized as a constituency a group must be supported by at
> least 5 people who are already NCSG members, appoint an organizer
> (chair) and submit a charter. Steps:
> 1) A prospective constituency organizer issues a notification
> of intent to form a constituency to the entire NCSG via its email list
> 2) When 5 or more NCSG members volunteer to join the NCSG on
> the public list it becomes eligible to schedule a meeting (which
> can be either in person or online)
> 3) The eligible constituency holds a meeting(s) to draft a
> charter. The charter defines its grouping principle, eligibility
> criteria, and procedures. The meetings also designate a
> constituency chair, and other officers if so desired.
> 4) The charter is submitted to the NCSG EC for ratification.
> Ratification is based exclusively on due diligence whether there
> are really at least 5 members, whether the constituency’s
> eligibility rules or procedures contravene NCSG charter in some way
>
> Current members of NCUC are automatically made members of NCSG, but
> NCUC dissolves as a constituency once this proposal is adopted.
>
> NCSG members can join any constituency, provided that they meet the
> constituency’s own eligibility criteria.
> Should we allow constituencies to exclude based on criteria? I
> propose yes – otherwise constituencies are meaningless
> Should we allow members to join more than one constituency? I
> propose yes, as long as voting for council seats and chair is NCSG-
> wide.
>
> Constituencies keep track of their own membership, but members
> should reflect their status on the official NCSG social network
> site. Status is reviewed by the EC bi-annually to see if they still
> exceed the 5-member threshold.
>
>
IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: robin at ipjustice.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20081011/8275f85d/attachment.html>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list