[ncdnhc-discuss] Names Council Resolutions

Adam Peake ajp at glocom.ac.jp
Tue Sep 24 18:41:07 CEST 2002


2 & 3 are fine and NC should support.  Suggest a friendly amendment of 1:

"The proposed GNSO council should have three representatives per 
constituency. This situation will be reviewed 12 months after the 
formation of the council."


I think it would be helpful to have some language to say that this 
resolution in no way precludes the creation of new constituencies as 
recommended by the ERC, but I'm not sure how to say it and suspect it 
would raise objections (even thou the ERC suggests it should happen.) 
The issue of new constituencies is really a matter for a new 
resolution, one that has language more positive toward the creation 
of constituencies than the NC's previous statements on the subject.

Thanks,

Adam



At 12:25 PM -0400 9/23/02, DannyYounger at cs.com wrote:
>Regarding the first Resolution:  The concept of three representatives per
>constituency "in perpetuity" is a horrible idea.  The ICANN Board has
>indicated their resolve to allow for the creation of provisional
>constituencies, mentioning the following as examples of groups that might
>self-organize to create such new constituencies:
>
>Academic and public entities
>Individual domain name holders
>Consumer and civil society organizations
>Small business users
>
>It is my intent to participate with others to launch a Small Business
>Constituency, and I expect that registrants and other groups will similarly
>act to establish their own provisional constituencies (the academics and
>civil society groups within the NCDNHC might even decide to form their own
>body as well).  A 21-member Council is already sufficiently large, and adding
>3, 6, or 12 more members to this Council will create an unworkable
>environment. 
>
>The original proposal in the Blueprint that called for 2 members per
>constituency makes a lot more sense than the latest proposals and resolutions
>tendered. 
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


-- 



More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list