[ncdnhc-discuss] [Suggestion] "Proxy"

[Norbert Klein]

Dear YJ,

can you please elaborate your proposal - how would it work, or how does 
it work in other constituencies? Is it - with others constituenceis - 
strengthening their ability to act quickly during the ICANN sessions in 
terms of voting? How does it related to the on-line voting?

I am sympathetic to your proposal, as it seems to be a way to make it 
easier for the NCDNHC to react and act during ICANN meetings. In the 
past I felt ometimes that the NCDNHC was somewhat paralyzed to act 
during ICANN meetings (as those who are present cannot speak fully for 
the whole constituency), while other constituencies did not seem to have 
the same constraints.

Norbert




YJ Park wrote:
> Dear members,
> 
> Since NCDNHC was recognized as a constituency by ICANN Board
> in August 1999, NCDNHC has tried to build effective working relations 
> among members through email, teleconference and f2f meeting. 
> 
> After more than three years, it is high time for NCDNHC to introduce 
> another working mechanism in addition to the existing mechanisms 
> which has turned out to be effective system in other constituency 
> especially in ccTLD constituency and NC.
> 
> "PROXY"
> 
> A number of members expressed they could not come to Shanghai
> meeting due to many reasons. However, if we introduce "PROXY",
> those who cannot be in Shanghai in person can "indirectly" attend 
> NCDNHC meeting giving their "Proxy" to other members who are 
> planning to attend.
> 
> If this is agreeable, I would like to propose NCDNHC in Shanghai
> shall introduce "PROXY" to its members.
> 
> Regards,
> YJ
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
> 



-- 
Norbert Klein
Open Forum of Cambodia: www.forum.org.kh

Support democratic control of the Internet!
Go to http://www.icannatlarge.org and Join ICANN At Large!