[ncdnhc-discuss] Resolutions
Harold J. Feld
hfeld at mediaaccess.org
Thu Oct 10 20:34:28 CEST 2002
Hopefully, these will be posted to the webpage soon.
The following resolutions were posted to the list and recieved second.
Proposed Resolution #1
PROPOSED RESOLUTION: BOARD EDUCATION ON DUTIES
Whereas: ICANN's responsibilities extend globally, but its place of
incorporation is in the state of California in the United States.
Whereas: California Corporations Law specifies both rights and
obligations of corporate directors including directors of Public Benefit
Corporations such as ICANN under which directors personally may incur
both civil and criminal liabilities.
Whereas: Under the California Corporations Law, directors of a Public
Benefit Corporation, have a legal duty to perform their duties on the
Board and on committees of the Board "in good faith, in a manner such
director believes to be in the best interests of the corporation and
with such care,
including reasonable inquiry, as an ordinarily prudent person in a like
position would use under similar circumstances." (Calif Code, Section
5231, Nonprofit Public Benefits Corporation,
www.leginfo.ca.gov/.html/corp_table_of_contents.html).
Whereas: California Code Section 5231 requires an understanding of
complex legal concepts that are influenced and interpreted under
California and United States law and cases.
Whereas: Only one current Director of the ICANN board is a) a U.S.
citizen or b) an attorney licensed in California. Accordingly, the ICANN
Directors may not be expert in their legal responsibilities or even in
the culture from which these rules and obligations are derived.
Whereas: All Constituencies of ICANN are entitled to and deserving of
Directors who know and understand their legal obligations under
California law with respect to the employees and staff of ICANN, the
purposes of the Corporation, and the corporate actions taken by the
Directors (including MoUs and contracts signed).
Be it hereby resolved that:
The ICANN Board undertake immediately after the Shanghai meeting, and
prior to any further meetings, conference calls, or decisions, to engage
an independent legal expert to offer a class or classes (online, by
telephone or in person) on the rights and obligations on Board members
under US and California law. Such an expert must be neutral, and come
from a law firm or ethics practice that does not currently participate
in the ICANN process or represent clients who participate in the ICANN
process.
Such a process must delve into the meaning of obligations including
"good faith," "care," "reasonable inquiry" and "ordinarily prudent person."
Such a class must be obligatory on all existing Directors, and a
prerequisite for all new Directors prior to assuming their office.
###
Proposed Resolution #2
Submitted by Hans Klein
Director, Civil Society Democracy Project
Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR)
PROPOSED RESOLUTION: NEUTRALITY OF STAFF AND COUNSEL
Whereas: The deliberations and decisions of ICANN must be made in the
interests of the global Internet community as a whole.
Whereas: The protection of ICANN and the protection of its directors
require that its policy and legal advice come from independent and neutral
advisors.
Whereas: All ICANN constituencies are entitled to the reassurance that
their concerns and recommendations are being fairly and impartially
evaluated by the staff and counsel responsible for the preparation of
recommendations and reports to the directors and to the Internet
community.
Whereas: The Neutrality and Independence of ICANN's staff and counsel
are critical to public perceptions of legitimacy and accountability.
Be it resolved that:
The ICANN Board should take immediate steps to adopt a policy
which requires that no staff or counsel of ICANN who is engaged in policy
or legal recommendations or reports shall directly or indirectly
represent (as
a legal matter) or directly or indirectly benefit (as a financial
matter) from
individuals or entities who participate in any of the ICANN constituencies
or in any ICANN process.
###
A third resolution was proposed by myself, but was not seconded by
anyone. Accordingly, it will not be considered.
Harold Feld
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list