[ncdnhc-discuss] Fwd: [nc-deletes] Minutes - Conference Call, November 15

[Adam Peake]

Milton, see <http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-deletes/Arc00/msg00057.html>

Sorry, no time.

Adam



At 11:42 AM -0500 11/21/02, Milton Mueller wrote:
>This sounds not bad to me. However, can you explain what
>happens now when VeriSign "autorenews" the domain name?
>Does it simply mean that the registrar is billed for it? If so,
>this proposal seems like a better system. A minor wealth
>transfer goes from the registry to the registrar, in that the
>registry loses a max of 45 days of income on the name. Any
>idea why VeriSign is proposing this?
>
>>>>  <DannyYounger at cs.com> 11/20/02 05:11PM >>>
>
>1. VeriSign GRS would NOT autorenew the domain name. Rather, the domain
>name expiration date and status would remain unchanged.
>2. No funds would be debited from the registrars account.
>3. The 45 day AutoRenew grace period would begin.
>
>During the 45 day AutoRenew grace period, the following actions could
>occur:
>1. To keep the domain name, the Registrar would have to Explicitly Renew
>the domain name.
>2. To delete a domain name, the registrar would use the RRP Delete
>command.
>3. If a registrar did nothing, VeriSign GRS would automatically delete
>the domain name at the end of the 45 day AutoRenew grace period.
>
>Are you in favor of this proposed policy change?
>
>===============================================================
>http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/registrars/Arc01/msg03622.html
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


--