[ncdnhc-discuss] Fwd: [nc-deletes] Minutes - Conference Call, November 15
DannyYounger at cs.com
DannyYounger at cs.com
Wed Nov 20 20:19:07 CET 2002
Harold,
Let's take a look at this situation from the registrars point of view...
A domain expires tomorrow. Upon such expiration the Registry immediately
invoices the registrar who must either execute the delete command and receive
a credit against the charge or must proceed with the renewal process. In the
event that the registrar has an auto-renewal program, there is a strong
likelihood that a certain percentage of registrants will dispute the renewal
and will notify their credit card companies accordingly (resulting in a
chargeback to the registrar). At this point the registrar has already
shelled out the money to the Registry and is past the window of opportunity
to receive a credit from the Registry. The registrar now believes it has
"rights" to the domain name because it has paid out its own money for that
domain name to the Registry in addition to paying the associate chargeback
fees imposed by the credit card services providers. This in turn results in
the registrar putting the domain name up for auction in the secondary market
in order to recover its expenses.
In this very common scenario, the name is not returned to the pool of
available names as the "default option" but rather becomes the exclusive
property of a single registrar. You are arguing that the name can and should
go back into the pool. I don't see this happening as long as registrars are
unable to secure a credit from the Registry for domains that fall victim to
such chargebacks.
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list