[ncdnhc-discuss] boundaries of IPR policy making

[James Love]

Dave, maybe you should read the ICANN web page on the Committee on ICANN
Reform.   I didn't notice that (a) you were in charge of anything, or (b)
that there are specific requirements about how one expresses one's views.
Can you tell me the authority for your instructions on how to participate in
this process.   Maybe you can share your thoughts on what the ICANN mission
should  be on IPR, rather than trying to tell me how to express my views.

Jamie

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Crocker" <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
To: "James Love" <james.love at cptech.org>
Cc: "NCDNHC-discuss list" <discuss at icann-ncc.org>;
<reform-comments at icann.org>; "Alejandro Pisanty - DGSCA y FQ, UNAM"
<apisan at servidor.unam.mx>
Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: [ncdnhc-discuss] boundaries of IPR policy making


> At 10:09 AM 5/12/2002 -0400, James Love wrote:
> >I would like ICANN to adopt a boundary statement withregard to its role
in
> >making IPR policy.  In particular, I would like ICANN policy making for
this
> >to be limited to the UDRP and whois policy, the two areas of current
policy
> >making, and to declare that it will not consider addition IPR policy
making.
>
> James,
>
> The current documents that define ICANN's mission and scope are publicly
> available.  If you wish to modify any of those documents, please offer
> specific text that can be added to the appropriate documents.
>
> This will permit debating the efficacy of concrete text rather than a
> general idea.
>
> It would also help for you to explain what problem you are solving that
> makes such a basic change appropriate.  Since your proposal is based upon
a
> fear of expanded IPR scope, what is there in the ICANN history that
> warrants the fear?
>
> d/
>
> ----------
> Dave Crocker <mailto:dave at tribalwise.com>
> TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com>
> tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>