[ncdnhc-discuss] ITU Response to TACD

[Dave Crocker]

James,

Please try not to distract the discussion.

You have put the ITU forward as desirable for an ICANN oversight function 
but appear unwilling or unable to focus on the difficulties that would be 
necessary to overcome to make such oversight practical.

Moving from idea to operation requires working through the 
details.  Comments about practical limitations are not an attack on your 
person, they are part of the process of making an idea practical.

Please try to refrain from lashing out with emotional attacks just because 
someone is pointing out practical concerns about your proposals.

d/

At 01:38 PM 5/1/2002 -0400, James Love wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Dave Crocker" <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
> > >Sector Member one or more organizations that each have thousands of
> > >members.  For example, ISOC is an ITU-T Sector Member, exempt from fees.
> >
> > Unfortunately, this will disenfranchise many who might wish to
>participate.
>
>    Dave,     1. What is the current price of 3 votes on the DNSO NC?
>                  2.  When does ICANN cut off the NCC voting privileges?
>                  3.  How many fee waivers does ICANN hand out for:
>
>                              a.  Particpation in SOs
>                              b.  Submitting a TLD bid
>
>--------------------------------
>James Love mailto:james.love at cptech.org
>http://www.cptech.org +1.202.387.8030 mobile +1.202.361.3040
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dave at tribalwise.com>
TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850