[ncdnhc-discuss] ICANN Reform: Role of ITU

Barbara Simons simons at acm.org
Wed May 1 06:11:00 CEST 2002


I completely agree.  Let's not lose sight of the fact that the ALSC,
followed by Lynn, decided to do away with democratic input to ICANN.
Barbara

On 4/30/02 7:48 PM, "Marc Schneiders" <marc at fuchsia.bijt.net> wrote:

> What is wrong with the original idea to let users elect half the board?
> Why not implement what was intended in the white paper? Because that does
> slow down ICANN? If the bottom up etc. process is the stifling factor, how
> come that the very non-bottom-up TF on new TLDs (see recent messages
> around resignationof YJPark from this) has produced nothing so far? There
> is no reason whatsoever to try to improve on the Lynn plan, Jamie. We
> don't want the Lynn plan.




More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list