[ncdnhc-discuss] Resolutions in NCDNHC meeting, Accra

[Alejandro Pisanty - DGSCA y FQ, UNAM]

Chun,

thanks for this apt summary.

May I add that YJ's motion was challenged by me on grounds of conflict of
interest which she herself expressed to have in this matter.

Alejandro Pisanty


.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
Director General de Servicios de Computo Academico
UNAM, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
Tel. (+52-55) 5622-8541, 5622-8542 Fax 5550-8405
http://www.dgsca.unam.mx
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, www.isoc.org
=====>>> Participa en ICANN, www.icann.org
.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .



On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Chun Eung Hwi wrote:

> Dear ncdnhc members,
>
> Sorry for this delayed report!
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Chun Eung Hwi
> General Secretary, PeaceNet | phone:     (+82) 2- 2062-1302
> Seoul Yangchun P.O.Box 81   |   pcs:     (+82) 019-259-2667
> Seoul, 158-600, Korea       | eMail:   ehchun at peacenet.or.kr
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The resolution of "conflicts of interest" was passed with one sentence
> added by Alejandro Pijanty. There were 14 in favor, 2 in against, 3 in
> abstention.
> The added sentence of bracket wrapped is as follows.
>
> 2. Any member of the NCDNHC Adcom or anyone who represents the NCDNHC on
> any DNSO task force or committee should disclose potential conflicts of
> interest. [ Some forms of potential conflict of interest including working
> for an organization that will benefit or provide the constituency member,
> a possible benefit from a given outcome of policies on which the
> constituency works ] These disclosures should be available from the NCDNHC
> web page.
>
> ----------------------
> The resolution on protection of Domain Name Holders in registration of
> domain names was slightly supported with a minor correction - inserting "4
> (snip) ¡¦ to protect domain name owners [against] abusive practices". Hans
> Klein argued that the word of "registrars" in No. 3 and No 4 should be
> taken out because registrars are introduced for promoting competition and
> so ultimately helpful for consumers. But the original text was supported
> by 6 while the revised version deleting "registrars" was supported by 5.
> Abstention was 5.
>
> ----------------------
> The resolution on .org and protection of existing domain name holders was
> declined because most participants felt that all key elements of that
> draft resolution have been already contained in NC task force policy
> document.
>
> YJ Park proposed to amend the original draft by taking out 2, 3, 4 and
> inserting new paragraph as follows, but it was lost. It only got 4 in
> favor, 9 in against, 6 in abstention. Rob Courtney argued that everybody
> including Board members clearly know that the divesture of .org should be
> done within this year, and so such resolution has no value.
>
> "2. The NCDNHC asks the Board to pay attention to .org divesture in order
> to ensure timely transfer from Verisign to a new registry operator in
> 2002."
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>