[ncdnhc-discuss] Statement on Lynn Proposal
Dave Crocker
dhc2 at dcrocker.net
Sat Mar 2 16:45:38 CET 2002
At 05:12 PM 3/1/2002 -0500, Rob Courtney wrote:
>a) Yet, the Board has abridged its own process to evaluate the merits of
>the report prepared by its own advisory committee on that matter - the At
>Large Study Committee - which only a few days ago
1. Lynn issued the proposal, not the Board. The proposal did not come
from the Board.
2. What was issued is a proposal, not a decision. How does it abridge an
open process to have someone -- anyone -- put forward a proposal for public
review and comment?
What really IS noteworthy about your statement on Lynn's proposal is how
thoroughly it validates his observation that there is too much focus on
process and not enough on content. And there is too much focus on
criticism and not enough on constructive proposing.
d/
----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker at brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253; (new)fax +1.408.850.1850
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list