[ncdnhc-discuss] who pays for independent review?

[Ethan Katsh]

At 06:15 PM 6/24/02 -0500, you wrote:
>t,
>
>while this is working, do you have any specific proposals that actually
>relate to domain name policy? these are good days to address them...
>
>Alejandro Pisanty

         Since you ask, here is a simple proposal. Get rid of the 
requirement in the Blueprint for Reform concerning the independent review 
recommendation (Section 5: Bylaw Amendments and Alleged Infringements) that 
will require the loser to pay the costs of an unsuccessful challenge. This 
may appear fair but it will impact more on this constituency than any 
other. Who on this list would risk a thousand dollars or more for the 
chance to contest an ICANN bylaw? I'd prefer that ICANN bear the costs for 
such requests, which are likely to be quite few in number since they are 
limited to alleging bylaw violations, but even a system in which the loser 
pays if the arbitrator finds the claim frivolous would be preferable.

Ethan





>.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
>      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
>Director General de Servicios de Computo Academico
>UNAM, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
>Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
>Tel. (+52-55) 5622-8541, 5622-8542 Fax 5622-8540
>http://www.dgsca.unam.mx
>*
>** 10 Aniversario de Internet Society - www.inet2002.org en Washington, DC
>---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, www.isoc.org
>  Participa en ICANN, www.icann.org
>.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
>
>
>
>On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, t byfield wrote:
>
> > dhc2 at dcrocker.net (Sun 06/23/02 at 11:06 AM -0700):
> >
> > > >I think the community is owed a statement about the effect of the ISOC
> > > >application.  Who will be recused and how much from what?
> > >
> > > Rather than placing a broad, unspecified burden on a broad, unspecified
> > > group of people, you should consider your own obligation to provide
> > > specific questions, about specific issues, for specific people.
> >
> > narrow, specific burden: directly and proactively take up the possible
> > issue of blokzijl's conflict(s).
> >
> > narrow, specific group: ICANN's COI committee.
> >
> > > That way, there is a chance of getting meaningful dialogue, rather than
> > > simply creating yet another opportunity for making broad, unspecified
> > > attacks.
> >
> > quit whingeing.
> >
> > cheers,
> > t
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> > http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss