[ncdnhc-discuss] ISOC to bid on .org
t byfield
tbyfield at panix.com
Sat Jun 8 22:06:08 CEST 2002
apisan at servidor.unam.mx (Sat 06/08/02 at 02:38 PM -0500):
> > Well, ICANN's own study said the elections were feasiable, as pointed
> > out by Adam. The proposal was to use domain name registrations for voter
> > registration, and why won't that work?
>
> 1. In some countries DN registration is tremendously restricted.
> Conditions vary too widely to make a fair basis. DN registration or even
> "DN plus" was rejected as "poll tax". Lots of arguments pile up along this
> line.
so ICANN's role is to ensure downward harmonization: registration
is extremely restricted in slovenia and finland therefore there'll
be no free-form public representation anywhere in the world.
> 2. Not at all immune to capture.
heh. coming from someone on the ICANN board, this is priceless.
cheers,
t
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list