[ncdnhc-discuss] Fwd: [cctld-discuss] ICANN updates

[t byfield]

dhc2 at dcrocker.net (Tue 07/30/02 at 03:20 PM -0700):

> On the other hand, it is interesting to see that all the court authorized 
> were pretty much the same terms as ICANN had been specifying.

good to see that you're 'staying on message,' dave:

     <http://www.icann.org/announcements/advisory-29jul02.htm>

     ICANN [...] notes that the practical effect of the overall 
     ruling is quite similar to the ICANN procedure that Mr. 
     Auerbach rejected last October.
     <...>
     The ultimate effect of the Court order is essentially the 
     same as the ICANN procedure that Mr. Auerbach refused to 
     follow. 

just like you were with your bumpf about 'consuming resourses':

     It is unfortunate that ICANN's limited resources must be 
     used for matters such as this [...]

cheers,
t