[ncdnhc-discuss] Second Status Report on Implementation of Evolution and Reform

[YJ Park]

Adam and all,

This constituency had strongly addressed the need for reform from 
earlier days of ICANN and the very reform is being done without 
many inputs from or interactions with this constituency which is 
unfortunate for both ICANN and NCDNHC.

As far as I understand many members of NCDNHC feel ICANN
is hopeless or the ICANN we knew is now dissappearing to the
history and many of NCDNHC members do feel inertia with frustration
based on experience that the efforts to be heard turn out to be futile.  

However, NCDNHC should pull it together as a responsible entity.

Please, volunteer!

YJ

> Wish all the people who have volunteered to work on this stuff well.
> Only concern is that the non-commercial view is not particularly well 
> represented on the domain policy group. Bret will do a fine job, but 
> perhaps an other would have been positive.  Seem to remember that the 
> UDRP, very important piece of domain name policy and one of ICANN's 
> few successes, was very much improved by "non-commercial" input. 
> Taking that success as an example, some more thought to an additional 
> mind from the non-commercial world would be helpful.
> 
> And additional diversity would not a bad idea, how we make policy 
> differs from place to place, a process apparently intuitive, may not 
> be so.
> 
> (Not volunteering.)
> 
> Adam
> 
> 
> 
> >Thank you, Eric and Hans, for reminding us of this process!
> >
> >>  When I read the Second Status Report, I was surprised to see that my name
> >>  was not included in the list of people providing assistance to the
> >>  ERC.  Like those listed, I had offered to serve.
> >
> >So, ERC now has three kind of assistance from various people.
> >My first impression on these efforts is it would have been much
> >better to have more balanced representation in each identified
> >assistance by ERC.
> >
> >Name policy group has too many people from some specific
> >region which strangely also applies to ALAC.
> >
> >Furthermore, it would be desirable for Becky to share who she
> >is working together with. I am happy to provide my views to enhance
> >accountability in implementing blueprint. As pointed out in Bucharest,
> >the blueprint does need careful attentions to implement "geographical
> >diversity" due to the current one or two representation from various
> >groups.
> >
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >------
> >Becky Burr to provide recommendations for implementing several specific
> >aspects of the Blueprint dealing with accountability. Charter of the Office
> >of
> >Ombudsman, the independent review arbitration process for alleged bylaw
> >violations, and appropriate modifications of the Reconsideration Policy of
> >ICANN.
> >
> >Rita Rodin has agreed to lead an assistance effort dealing with the names
> >policy development process. Bret Fausett, Jeff Neuman, Marilyn Cade,
> >Carolyn Chicoine, Phillip Sheppard, Guillermo Carey and Bruce Tonkin.
> >
> >At-Large Advisory Committee: Gabriel Piñeiro (LatinoamerICANN);
> >Tommi Karttaavi (ISOC Finland); Peter M. Shane (InSITeS - Institute for the
> >Study of Information Technology and Society); Núria de la Fuente Teixidó
> >(STEC - Sistemas Técnicos de Enseñanza Consultores);
> >Edmundo Valenti (Internet Society Argentina Chapter); Vittorio Bertola (ISOC
> >Italy);
> >Izumi Aizu (former NAIS member - NGO and Academic ICANN Study).
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >------------
> >
> >Thank you,
> >YJ
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Discuss mailing list
> >Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> >http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
> 
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>