[ncdnhc-discuss] Second Status Report on Implementation of Evolution and Reform

[J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin]

Dear YJ Park,
I guess that if the ERC wanted assistance instead of support it would 
behave differently. I am afraid that the only result of this attitude will 
kill the consensus we consensually agreed the ICANN needed to  get out of 
its smoke screen "by surprise management" crisis. The result is that most 
probably the ICANN is to end up as an "ICANN meetings" organizer, with 
little or no bearing on what is not the strict ".arpa" namespace 
managerment. This will obviously fully confrom with the RFC 920 but it will 
call for the ITU-I to be created at some stage, while ity could have been 
the ITU-IANA.

The challenge we now have is to organize enough to get that ITU-I rolling 
in a way it cooperates with the ailing Telecomunication industry, rather 
than depending from it. Obvioulsy WorldCom helps a lot. But this will 
happen through network expansion and innovation rather than by by-laws 
discussions.
jfc

At 05:52 25/07/02, YJ Park wrote:

>Thank you, Eric and Hans, for reminding us of this process!
>
> > When I read the Second Status Report, I was surprised to see that my name
> > was not included in the list of people providing assistance to the
> > ERC.  Like those listed, I had offered to serve.
>
>So, ERC now has three kind of assistance from various people.
>My first impression on these efforts is it would have been much
>better to have more balanced representation in each identified
>assistance by ERC.
>
>Name policy group has too many people from some specific
>region which strangely also applies to ALAC.
>
>Furthermore, it would be desirable for Becky to share who she
>is working together with. I am happy to provide my views to enhance
>accountability in implementing blueprint. As pointed out in Bucharest,
>the blueprint does need careful attentions to implement "geographical
>diversity" due to the current one or two representation from various
>groups.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>------
>Becky Burr to provide recommendations for implementing several specific
>aspects of the Blueprint dealing with accountability. Charter of the Office
>of
>Ombudsman, the independent review arbitration process for alleged bylaw
>violations, and appropriate modifications of the Reconsideration Policy of
>ICANN.
>
>Rita Rodin has agreed to lead an assistance effort dealing with the names
>policy development process. Bret Fausett, Jeff Neuman, Marilyn Cade,
>Carolyn Chicoine, Phillip Sheppard, Guillermo Carey and Bruce Tonkin.
>
>At-Large Advisory Committee: Gabriel Piñeiro (LatinoamerICANN);
>Tommi Karttaavi (ISOC Finland); Peter M. Shane (InSITeS - Institute for the
>Study of Information Technology and Society); Núria de la Fuente Teixidó
>(STEC - Sistemas Técnicos de Enseñanza Consultores);
>Edmundo Valenti (Internet Society Argentina Chapter); Vittorio Bertola (ISOC
>Italy);
>Izumi Aizu (former NAIS member - NGO and Academic ICANN Study).
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>------------
>
>Thank you,
>YJ
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
>---
>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.373 / Virus Database: 208 - Release Date: 01/07/02