[ncdnhc-discuss] Election results!

[James Love]

Milton, fair enough.  But I'm sure Dany can clarify where he stands, given
the info given on the proceedures too.  I think we have time for that.
Dany?
Jamie

----- Original Message -----
From: "Milton Mueller" <mueller at syr.edu>
To: <love at cptech.org>; <discuss at icann-ncc.org>; <vandrome at renater.fr>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 7:57 AM
Subject: Re: [ncdnhc-discuss] Election results!


> >>> "James Love" <love at cptech.org> 02/27/02 18:22 PM >>>
> > Milton, did we miss something?     I didn't see
> > anyone withdraw from anything.  Jamie
>
> Here is the penultimate sentence in
> Dany's message:
>
> "I have no trust anymore in this vote process
> and I am not going to support it by participating to
> the second round, and I will not participate to this
> non-trusted adcom (not because of candidates, but
> because the election process)."
>
> That sounds like a withdrawal to me.
> Unfortunate in the extreme, becdause Dany has
> contributed and could continue to contribute
> to the constituency. But rather unambiguous,
> and we don't have time to sit around and wait.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Milton Mueller" <Mueller at syr.edu>
> To: <vandrome at renater.fr>
> Cc: <discuss at icann-ncc.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 10:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [ncdnhc-discuss] Election results!
>
>
> > OK, I'll interpret that as a withdrawal from the runoff race.
> >
> > Please let the constituency know whether you are withdrawing
> > from Adcom, too, because that would make Marc Schneiders
> > the EU representative.
> >
> > So our new Names Council representatives are:
> >  - Harold Feld
> >  - Erick Iriarte
> >  - Eung Hwi Chun
> >
> > The idea that the vote results are wrong or cannot be "trusted"
> > is garbage.
> >
> > There was one organization that had clearly paid
> > its membership dues - INIA of Latin America - and for some reason
> > it did not get a ballot. We had to take time to understand the
> > problem and clear it up, that is why the results were late.
> >
> > It is not easy to clear up confusion like that by means of asynchronous
> > communication. We had to take a couple of extra ays. Due to the
> > linkage between membership dues payment and voting rights,
> > the issue of who was an eligible voter and how to count them was
> > not as easy as Dany would like to make it appear. Nevertheless,
> > it is impossible for anyone to name a vote that was counted
> > that shouldn't have been counted, and it is impossible for anyone
> > to produce an illegitimate vote that was counted. There are,
> > of course, several members who sent in late ballots that were
> > not counted, but these would not have affected the results.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> > http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>