[ncdnhc-discuss] Proposed NCC resolution on conflicts

[Jefsey Morfin]

On 17:22 07/02/02, Dave Crocker said:
>If you check the definition of the word govern, you will discover that the 
>word is factually incorrect as a description of the DNSO.

This is pure amerICANNism gem (American language and your vision of the 
ICANN). The word governance (BTW a French XIIIth century word) is to 
consensus what commanding is to bodies and management is to organizations. 
It litterarly means the "house keeper business" as it is related to 
communittee life, the first natural communittee being the familly, the 
house. Belgium - the current EEC Chair - has published a White Book on the 
matter and wants to make its analysis the next European workshop after the 
euro. I doubt you can address it in a short comment like yours.


I don't think there is any problem with Kent staying and voting in the 
NCDNHC as long as he makes a clear difference between his positions when 
co-making decisions and when carrying them. And as long he is treated equal 
to the others what means others are treated equal to him what is not the 
case as long as I am concerned.

Should I have to be hired by Stuart to for the Frax to be treated equal to 
the Potter Yacht Club?
I only hope that this new postion of Kent will make that question and the 
one of its equal and fair application addressed quickly.


Dave Crocker also said:
 > However we now have a long track-record that shows that Kent's efforts 
tend to be towards things the rest of the constituency chooses not to adopt.

Is that why he has been hired by the ICANN? Is that to oppose or to be sure 
to be fully consensual?

Jefsey